Back

Level of Compliance and Predictors with Personal COVID-19-preventive measures Among Office Government Employees Returning to work in the post-epidemic period in Western Ethiopia: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Study

Kabito, G. G.; Abreham, M.; Tesfaye, A. H.; Guadu, T.

2022-07-29 public and global health
10.1101/2022.07.26.22278056 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe contemporary global issues, COVID-19 pandemic continued causing unprecedented impact on the public health, occupational health and the global economy. Keeping compliance with personal preventive measures is a vital tool for managing COVID-19 pandemic control and returning to work as no pharmaceutical treatments are currently available in Ethiopia. Although compliance with COVID -19 personal preventive measures (CPPMs) and predictors is well addressed in healthcare settings, data on the level of CPPMs and its determinants among government employees working in offices worldwide, including Ethiopia, is limited. This paper is aimed to fill this gaps. MethodsWe applied a cross-sectional study design from February to March, 2021. The participants were government workers working in offices who had resumed work. Stratified followed by simple random sampling technique was used to select 422 study participants from 30 government offices that had resumed work. Data were collected using a pre-tested and structured interviewer-administered questionnaires and analyzed by STATA 14 software. The significance of associations was established at p< 0.05 and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in the multivariable model. ResultsResponse rate 95.44% (N=394). The study found 22.3% (88) of study participants (95% CI = 18.5, 26.6) had high compliance with COVID -19 personal preventive measures during past month. Female workers were 2.80 times more likely than males to comply with COVID-19 personal preventive measures (AOR: 2.80, 95%CI (1.10, 7.12), favorable attitude towards COVID-19 prevention measures (AOR: 13.73, 95% CI (4.85, 38.83), high-risk perception of COVID-19 infections (AOR: 2.34; 95% CI (1.24, 4.41), and high misconception about COVID-19 (AOR : 3.92, 95% CI (1.45, 10.62) were predicted better compliance with COVID-19 PPMs (P < 0.05). ConclusionsIn sum, little proportion of sampled study participants complied with COVID -19 personal preventive measures. Sex, attitudes, risk perception, and misconception have all been identified as significant risk factors. Actions are needed to strengthen COVID -19 personal preventive measures among government employees to maintain COVID -19 control following work resumption. In the future, its vital to work on government employees attitudes and perceptions in order to improve compliance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.6%
2
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.4%
4
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
8
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
14
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%