Back

"Intellect", a Mobile Health Application based on cognitive-behavioral therapy principles, improves Anxiety and Worry: A Randomized Controlled Trial with an Active Control and a 2-Week Follow-Up

Kosasih, F. R.; Yee, V. T. S.; Toh, S. H. Y.; Suendermann, O.

2022-07-25 public and global health
10.1101/2022.07.25.22278034 medRxiv
Show abstract

Digital self-guided mobile health (mHealth) applications are cost-effective, accessible, and well-suited to improve mental health at scale. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effectiveness of a recently developed mHealth programme based on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) principles in improving worry. We also examined psychological mindedness (PM) as a mediator by which app engagement is thought to improve outcomes. The intervention group completed a 2-week "Anxiety and Worry" programme with daily CBT-informed activities, while the active waitlist-control completed a matched 2-week mHealth programme on procrastination. Participants filled out the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Psychological Mindedness Scale (PMS) at baseline, post-intervention and 2-week follow-up. App engagement was measured at post-intervention only. Both groups showed significant improvements on anxiety and depression scores from baseline to post-intervention, but no group differences were observed. From post-intervention to follow-up, only the intervention group showed further improvements for anxiety levels. Higher engagement with the mHealth app reported lower anxiety at post-intervention, and this relationship was fully mediated by psychological mindedness. This study provides evidence that (a) engaging in a CBT mHealth App can effectively reduce anxiety and worry, and (b) Psychological mindedness is a potential pathway by which engaging with a mHealthapp improves worry. While overall effect sizes were small, at the population level, these can make significant contributions to public mental health. Author SummaryIncreasing burden of anxiety amongst young adults has made widely accessible mobile health applications a promising tool in improving anxiety levels at scale. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (N=309) to examine the effectiveness of a brief, publicly available mobile health application (Intellects "Anxiety and Worry" programme) in reducing anxiety and worry levels among young adults. Participants who received the intervention showed significant reduction in anxiety and depression levels, however, effects did not significantly differ from active control. At post-intervention, only the intervention group continued to experience improvements in anxiety level. We also found that higher app engagement with the mHealth app predicted better anxiety and depression outcomes, and this relationship was fully mediated by psychological mindedness. Future work would benefit from inclusion of waitlist control, a larger sample size, and identification of alternative mediators.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.7%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
7
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.6%
8
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
9
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
11
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
14
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%
25
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%