Back

Can MRI-based multivariate gray matter volumetric distance predict motor progression and classify slow versus fast progressors in Parkinsons disease?

Vijayakumari, A. A.; Fernandez, H. H.; Walter, B. L.

2022-07-25 neurology
10.1101/2022.07.25.22278012 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionWhile Parkinsons disease (PD) related neurodegeneration is associated with structural changes in the brain, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been helpful in diagnosing PD or predicting the progression of motor symptoms. In this study, we aimed to develop a structural MRI-based biomarker to predict the rate of progression of motor symptoms and to classify patients based on the symptom severity (i.e. slow vs. fast progressors) in the early stages of PD. MethodsThe study included 59 patients with PD (n=40 for the primary analysis, 19 for the validation analysis), and 55 healthy controls with structural MRI from the Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database. We developed a patient-specific multivariate gray matter volumetric distance using Mahalanobis distance (MGMV) to investigate the changes in MGMV over time using longitudinal linear mixed-effect model, its potential as a biomarker to predict the rate of progression of motor function (MDS-UPDRS-part III) using multiple linear regression model, and classification of patients based on symptom severity using machine learning (ML). ResultsMGMV at BL significantly predicted changes in motor severity (p<0.05) and a trend level increase in MGMV over time (p = 0.09) were noted. We obtained 85% accuracy in discriminating patients according to their symptom severity, and on an independent test cohort, an accuracy of 90% was achieved. ConclusionsWe identified a promising structural MRI-based biomarker for predicting the rate of progression of motor symptoms and classification of patients based on motor symptom severity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.