Social contact patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic in 21 European countries: evidence from a two-year study
Wong, K. L.; Gimma, A.; Coletti, P.; CoMix Europe Working Group, ; Faes, C.; Beutels, P.; Hens, N.; Jaeger, V. K.; Karch, A.; Johnson, H.; Edmunds, W. J.; Jarvis, C. I.
Show abstract
Most countries have enacted some restrictions to reduce social contacts to slow down disease transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic. For nearly two years, individuals likely also adopted new behaviours to avoid pathogen exposure based on personal circumstances. We aimed to understand the way in which different factors affect social contacts - a critical step to improving future pandemic responses. The analysis was based on repeated cross-sectional contact survey data collected in 21 European countries between March 2020 and March 2022. We calculated the mean daily contacts reported using a clustered bootstrap by country and by settings (at home, at work, or in other settings). Where data were available, contact rates during the study period were compared with rates recorded prior to the pandemic. We fitted censored individual-level generalized additive mixed models to examine the effects of various factors on the number of social contacts. The survey recorded 463,336 observations from 96,456 participants. In all countries where comparison data were available, contact rates over the previous two years were substantially lower than those seen prior to the pandemic (approximately from over 10 to <5), predominantly due to fewer contacts outside the home. Government restrictions imposed immediate effect on contacts, and these effects lingered after the restrictions were lifted. Across countries, the relationships between national policy, individual perceptions, or personal circumstances determining contacts varied. Our study, coordinated at the regional level, provides important insights into the understanding of the factors associated with social contacts to support future infectious disease outbreak responses.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Time trends in social contacts before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONNECT study 94%
- The influence of COVID-19 risk perception and vaccination status on the number of social contacts across Europe: insights from the CoMix study 94%
- Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and deaths: cross-national natural experiment in 32 European countries 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of RT-PCR-detected SARS-CoV-2 infection at schools: First results from the Austrian School-SARS-CoV-2 Study 93%
- Extremely high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in a strictly-Orthodox Jewish community in the UK 92%
- Workplace Contact Patterns in England during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of the Virus Watch prospective cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deprivation and Exposure to Public Activities during the COVID-19 Pandemic in England and Wales 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 infections in migrants and the role of household overcrowding: A causal mediation analysis of Virus Watch data 94%
- Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 into and within immigrant households. Nation-wide registry-study from Norway 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- CoMix: comparing mixing patterns in the Belgian population during and after lockdown 96%
- Dynamics of non-household contacts during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021 in the Netherlands 95%
- How well does societal mobility restriction help control the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from real-time evaluation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The differential impact of physical distancing strategies on social contacts relevant for the spread of COVID-19: Evidence from a multi-country survey 94%
- Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the United Kingdom, Italy and Slovenia 94%
- Acute and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on economic vulnerability: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.