Back

Dynamic in vivo mapping of the methylproteome using a chemoenzymatic approach

Farhi, J.; Jones, R. B.; Lee, R. S.; Verma, A. K.; Parwani, K. K.; Emenike, B.; Tang, K.-C.; Bagchi, P.; Raj, M.; Spangle, J.

2023-10-31 biochemistry Community evaluation
10.1101/2022.07.22.501130 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dynamic protein post-translation methylation is essential for cellular function, highlighted by the essential role of methylation in transcriptional regulation and its aberrant dysregulation in diseases including cancer. This underscores the importance of cataloging the cellular methylproteome. However, comprehensive analysis of the methylproteome remains elusive due to limitations in current enrichment and analysis pipelines. Here, we employ an L-Methionine analogue, ProSeMet, that is chemoenzymatically converted to the SAM analogue ProSeAM in cells and in vivo to tag proteins with a biorthogonal alkyne that can be directly detected via LC-MS/MS, or functionalized for subsequent selective enrichment and LC-MS/MS identification. Without enrichment, we identify lysine mono-, di-, and trimethylation, histidine methylation, and arginine methylation with site specific resolution on proteins including heat shock protein HSPA8, for which methylation is implicated in human disease. With enrichment, we identify 486 proteins known to be methylated and 221 proteins with novel methylation sites encompassing diverse cellular functions. Systemic ProSeMet delivery in mice pseudomethylates proteins across organ systems with blood-brain barrier penetrance and identifies site-specific pseudomethylation in vivo with LC-MS/MS. Leveraging these pipelines to define the cellular methylproteome may have broad applications for understanding the methylproteome in the context of disease.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.