Back

Evaluating the Adoption of Voice Recognition Technology for Real-Time Dictation in a Rural Healthcare System: A Retrospective Analysis of Dragon Medical One

Onitilo, A. A.; Shour, A. R.; Puthoff, D. S.; Tanimu, Y. R.; Joseph, A.; Sheehan, M. T.

2022-07-22 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2022.07.22.22277923 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn 2013, Marshfield Clinic Health System (MCHS) implemented the Dragon Medical One (DMO) system provided by Nuance Management Center (NMC) for Real-Time Dictation (RTD), embracing the idea of streamlined clinic workflow, reduced dictation hours, and improved documentation legibility. Since then, MCHS has observed a trend of reduced time in documentation, however, the target goal of 100% adoption of voice recognition (VR)-based RTD has not been met. ObjectiveTo evaluate the uptake/adoption of VR technology for RTD in MCHS, between 2018-2020. MethodsDMO data for 1,373 MCHS providers from 2018-2020 were analyzed. The study outcome was VR uptake, defined as the number of hours each provider used VR technology to dictate patient information, used as continuous, and classified as no/yes. Covariates included sex, age, US-trained/international medical graduates, trend, specialty, and facility. Descriptive statistics and unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed. Stata/SE.version.17 was used for analyses. P-values less than/equal to 0.05 were considered statistically significant. ResultsOf the 1,373 MCHS providers, the mean (SD) age was 48.3 (12.4) years. VR uptake was higher than no uptake (72.0% vs. 28.0%). In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, VR uptake was 4.3 times and 7.7 times higher in 2019-2020 compared to 2018, respectively (OR:4.30,95%CI:2.44-7.46 and AOR:7.74,95%CI:2.51-23.86). VR uptake was 0.5 and 0.6 times lower among US-trained physicians compared to internationally-trained physicians (OR:0.53,95%CI:0.37-0.76 and AOR:0.58,95%CI:0.35-0.97). Uptake was 0.2 times lower among physicians aged 60/above than physicians aged 29/less (OR:0.20,95%CI:0.10-0.59, and AOR:0.17,95%CI:0.27-1.06). ConclusionSince 2018, VR adoption has increased significantly across MCHS. However, it was lower among US-trained physicians than among internationally-trained physicians (although internationally physicians were in minority) and lower among more senior physicians than among younger physicians. These findings provide critical information about VR trends, physician factors, and which providers could benefit from additional training to increase VR adoption in healthcare systems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.4%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
5
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
18
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
21
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
30
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%