Evaluating the Adoption of Voice Recognition Technology for Real-Time Dictation in a Rural Healthcare System: A Retrospective Analysis of Dragon Medical One
Onitilo, A. A.; Shour, A. R.; Puthoff, D. S.; Tanimu, Y. R.; Joseph, A.; Sheehan, M. T.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn 2013, Marshfield Clinic Health System (MCHS) implemented the Dragon Medical One (DMO) system provided by Nuance Management Center (NMC) for Real-Time Dictation (RTD), embracing the idea of streamlined clinic workflow, reduced dictation hours, and improved documentation legibility. Since then, MCHS has observed a trend of reduced time in documentation, however, the target goal of 100% adoption of voice recognition (VR)-based RTD has not been met. ObjectiveTo evaluate the uptake/adoption of VR technology for RTD in MCHS, between 2018-2020. MethodsDMO data for 1,373 MCHS providers from 2018-2020 were analyzed. The study outcome was VR uptake, defined as the number of hours each provider used VR technology to dictate patient information, used as continuous, and classified as no/yes. Covariates included sex, age, US-trained/international medical graduates, trend, specialty, and facility. Descriptive statistics and unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed. Stata/SE.version.17 was used for analyses. P-values less than/equal to 0.05 were considered statistically significant. ResultsOf the 1,373 MCHS providers, the mean (SD) age was 48.3 (12.4) years. VR uptake was higher than no uptake (72.0% vs. 28.0%). In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, VR uptake was 4.3 times and 7.7 times higher in 2019-2020 compared to 2018, respectively (OR:4.30,95%CI:2.44-7.46 and AOR:7.74,95%CI:2.51-23.86). VR uptake was 0.5 and 0.6 times lower among US-trained physicians compared to internationally-trained physicians (OR:0.53,95%CI:0.37-0.76 and AOR:0.58,95%CI:0.35-0.97). Uptake was 0.2 times lower among physicians aged 60/above than physicians aged 29/less (OR:0.20,95%CI:0.10-0.59, and AOR:0.17,95%CI:0.27-1.06). ConclusionSince 2018, VR adoption has increased significantly across MCHS. However, it was lower among US-trained physicians than among internationally-trained physicians (although internationally physicians were in minority) and lower among more senior physicians than among younger physicians. These findings provide critical information about VR trends, physician factors, and which providers could benefit from additional training to increase VR adoption in healthcare systems.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 95%
- Identifying clinical skill gaps of healthcare workers using a digital clinical decision support algorithm during outpatient pediatric consultations in primary health centers in Rwanda 95%
- Sources of Successful Participant Engagement in a Public Health Research Study: a Focus on a Latino Community 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 95%
- Accuracy of preferred language data in a multi-hospital electronic health record in Toronto, Canada 94%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 95%
- Is virtual care the new normal? Evidence supporting Covid-19’s durable transformation on healthcare delivery 94%
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing in-person, blended and virtual training interventions; a real-world evaluation of HIV capacity building programs in 16 countries in sub-Saharan Africa 94%
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 94%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Revisiting the use and effectiveness of patient-held records in rural Malawi 94%
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 93%
- Integrating Community-Based Health Information System with a Patient-Centered Medical Home to Improve Care of Patients with Hypertension: A Longitudinal Observational Study Protocol 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.