Part-time or full-time teleworking? A systematic review of the psychosocial risk factors of telework from home
Antunes, E. D.; Bridi, L. R. T.; Santos, M.; Fischer, F. M.
Show abstract
Since the start of the Coronavirus pandemic thousands of people have experienced teleworking and this practice is becoming increasingly commonplace. Systematic reviews can yield evidence and information to help inform the development of policies and regulations, the aim of this study was to highlight the differences in exposure to psychosocial risk factors for health between part-time and full-time teleworking from home. The protocol of the systematic review of the literature was registered on PROSPERO 2020 platform - International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (number CRD42020191455), according to the PRISMA statement guidelines. The key words "telework" and frequency ("part-time" or "full-time"), together with their synonyms and variations, were searched. Independent researchers conducted the systematic search of 7 databases: Scopus, SciELO, PePSIC; PsycInfo, PubMed, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) and Web of Science. Of the 638 articles identified from 2010 to June 2021, 32 were selected for data extraction. The authors evaluated the risk of bias and quality of evidence of the studies included using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The results were categorized into 7 dimensions of psychosocial risk factors: work intensity and working hours; emotional demands; autonomy; social relationships at work; conflict of values, work insecurity and home/work interface. The results revealed scant practice of full-time teleworking prior to the pandemic. Regarding the psychosocial risk factors found, differences were evident before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. For part-time and full-time telework prior to the pandemic, the dimensions of intensification of work and working hours, social relationships at work, and the home-work interface were the most prominent factors. However, in studies performed during the COVID-19 pandemic where teleworking was mostly performed full-time, there was an increase in focus on emotional demands and the home-work interface, and a reduction in the other dimensions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of University Students’ Mental Health from the Perspective of Occupational Harmony 96%
- High prevalence of burnout syndrome among medical and nonmedical residents during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Ethical and psychosocial considerations for hospital personnel in the Covid-19 crisis: Moral injury and resilience 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The managerial role and psychosocial factors of job satisfaction: a cross-sectional study among Wittyfit’s users 96%
- Intensity of home-based telework and work engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Association of preference and frequency of teleworking with work functioning impairment: a nationwide cross-sectional study of Japanese full-time employees 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 95%
- Effect of working from home on the association between job demands and psychological distress 94%
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 94%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 94%
- The Use of Machine Learning in Occupational Risk Communication for Healthcare Workers – Protocol for scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 94%
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 93%
- Spread of infection and treatment interruption among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.