Importance of external validation and subgroup analysis in artificial-intelligence detecting low ejection fraction from electrocardiograms
Yagi, R.; Goto, S.; Katsumata, Y.; MacRae, C. A.; Deo, R. C.
Show abstract
IntroductionAsymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction (ALVD) carries an increased risk for overt heart failure and mortality, yet treatable to mitigate disease progression. An artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) model demonstrated promise in ALVD screening but an unexpected drop in performance was observed in external validation. We thus sought to train a de novo model for ALVD detection and investigate its performance across multiple institutions and across a broader set of patient strata. MethodsECGs taken within 14 days of an echocardiogram were obtained from 4 academic hospitals from the United States (BWH, MGH and UCSF) and Japan (Keio). Four AI models were trained to detect patients with ejection fraction < 40% using ECG from each of the 4 institutions. All the models were then evaluated on the held-out test dataset from the same intuition and all data from the 3 external institutions. Subgroup analyses stratified by patient characteristics and common overt ECG abnormalities were performed. ResultsA total of 221,846 ECGs were identified from the 4 institutions. While the BWH-trained and Keio-trained model yielded similar accuracy on its internal test data (AUROC 0.913 and 0.914 respectively), external validity was worse for Keio-trained model (AUROC: 0.905-0.915 for BWH-trained and 0.849-0.877 for Keio-trained model). Although ECG abnormalities including atrial fibrillation, left bundle branch block and paced rhythm reduced detection, the models performed robustly across patient characteristics and other ECG features. ConclusionDifferent dataset produces models with different performance highlighting the importance of external validation and extensive stratification analysis.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Mitral Valve Prolapse and Mitral Regurgitation with Video-based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms 94%
- International Evaluation Of An Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ecg Model Detecting Occlusion Myocardial Infarction 94%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 94%
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 94%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Procedural and Pharmacological Interventions on Deep Learning-based Electrocardiographic Markers of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) 94%
- External validation of a claims-based model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction class in patients with heart failure 94%
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Smartwatch Facilitated Remote Health Care for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Amid COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 94%
- Relationship of mild to moderate impairment of left ventricular ejection fraction with fatal ventricular arrhythmic events in cardiac sarcoidosis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- QRS detection in single-lead, telehealth electrocardiogram signals: benchmarking open-source algorithms 94%
- Use of a Continuous Single Lead Electrocardiogram Analytic to Predict Patient Deterioration Requiring Rapid Response Team Activation 94%
- Detecting QT prolongation From a Single-lead ECG With Deep Learning 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.