Back

Rickettsia infection rate along an altitudinal gradient as influenced by population genetic structure of Ixodid ticks

Regilme, M. A. F.; Sato, M.; Tamura, T.; Arai, R.; Sato, M. O.; Ikeda, S.; Watanabe, K.

2023-04-26 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.07.20.500722 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ixodid ticks, such as Ixodes ovatus and Haemaphysalis flava, are important vectors of tick-borne diseases in Japan, such as Japanese spotted fever caused by Rickettsia japonica. This study describes the population genetic structure and gene flow of I. ovatus and H. flava and their Rickettsia infection rates along an altitudinal gradient. A total of 346 adult I. ovatus and 243 H. flava were analyzed for the presence of Rickettsia by nested PCR targeting the 17kDA, gltA, rOmpA, and rOmpB genes. Population genetic structure was performed using the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (cox1) marker. The Rickettsia infection rates were 13.26% in I. ovatus and 6.17% in H. flava. For I. ovatus, the global FST value revealed significant genetic differentiation among the different populations, whereas H. flava showed non-significant genetic differentiation. The cox1 I. ovatus cluster dendrogram showed two cluster groups, while the haplotype network and phylogenetic tree showed three genetic groups. The two cluster groups and the three genetic groups found in I. ovatus showed a significant difference in their Rickettsia infection rates and mean altitude per group. No significant differences were found in the mean altitude or Rickettsia infection rates of H. flava. Our results suggest that low gene flow in the I. ovatus populations has caused spatially heterogenous Rickettsia infection rates along the altitudinal gradient. This information can be used in understanding the relationship between the tick vector, its pathogen, and environmental factors, such as altitude, and for the control of tick-borne diseases in Japan.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.4%
2
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.7%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
7
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
8
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Journal of Medical Entomology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
15
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
17
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
19
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
21
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
23
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Microbial Pathogenesis
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%