Back

Clinical Utility of SPECT Neuroimaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review

Hanna, M.; Herman, J.; Zawada, B.; Andraos, C.; Karbi, O.; D'Souza, C.; Kessie, A.; Mazengia, G.; D'Souza, S.

2022-07-17 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2022.07.15.22277668
Show abstract

BackgroundThe most common assessment modalities to determine the level of injury following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) includes computerized tomography (CT) scans and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Evidence is mixed as to whether single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is specific and accurate in identifying TBI. ObjectivesThis study systematically assessed recent evidence of the clinical utility of SPECT in the diagnosis of TBI and examined the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT in TBI and its performance in comparison to other imaging modalities (e.g., CT and MRI). MethodsPubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were systematically searched for published articles from December 2012 to July 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies published in English that used SPECT to evaluate patients with all severity of TBIs were eligible for inclusion. Titles and abstracts were screened, and 111 selected full-text articles were independently screened based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria (guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; PRISMA) and assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. ResultsFourteen eligible studies, all observational, reporting location of lesions on brain SPECT were included, reporting data from 21632 participants of which 20,746 participants were from one study; the remaining 886 participants were from the remaining13 studies. The heterogeneity of the data precludes a meta-analysis. There was no consensus among experts from the thirteen smaller studies; however, the largest study indicated that the specificity of visual readings was 54%. In particular, abnormalities and brain perfusions may lead to false positives. Quantitative analysis theoretically increases the reliability of findings for brain SPECT, but error rates are unknown and not published. ConclusionThere is a lack of evidence to support the clinical utility of brain SPECT for the diagnosis and treatment of TBI.

Matching journals

1
Journal of Neurotrauma
Mary Ann Liebert Inc · based on 11 published papers
#1
229× avg
2
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 0.4%
26× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 54%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 37%
4.9%
5
Brain and Behavior
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.2%
36× avg
6
European Radiology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
31× avg
7
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.5%
28× avg
8
NeuroImage: Clinical
Elsevier BV · based on 77 published papers
Top 4%
7.0× avg
9
Journal of Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 22 published papers
Top 1%
20× avg
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 6%
4.2× avg
11
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Wiley · based on 10 published papers
Top 1%
26× avg
12
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Elsevier BV · based on 19 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
13
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 5%
4.6× avg
14
Neurology
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 38 published papers
Top 5%
5.3× avg
15
Brain Communications
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 79 published papers
Top 5%
4.5× avg
16
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
14× avg
17
NeuroImage
Elsevier BV · based on 36 published papers
Top 3%
7.1× avg
18
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 48%
0.9%
19
Journal of Affective Disorders
Elsevier BV · based on 72 published papers
Top 6%
1.8× avg
20
Heliyon
Elsevier BV · based on 57 published papers
Top 12%
2.0× avg
21
Brain Sciences
MDPI AG · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
9.5× avg