Back

Diagnostic tool to identify and treat DNA repair deficient gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas

Prosz, A.; Sahgal, P.; Morris, C. X.; Sztupinszki, Z.; Borcsok, J.; Diossy, M.; Tisza, V.; Spisak, S.; Rusz, O.; Csabai, I.; Huffman, B. M.; Singh, H.; Lazaro, J.-B.; Cecchini, M.; Cleary, J. M.; Szallasi, Z.; Sethi, N. S.

2022-07-16 cancer biology
10.1101/2022.07.14.500118 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and aimsDNA repair deficiency is a common feature of cancer. Homologous recombination (HR) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) are the two most frequently disabled DNA repair pathways in solid tumors. HR deficient breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancers respond well to platinum chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors. However, the frequency of DNA repair pathway deficiency in gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) still lacks diagnostic and functional validation. Furthermore, whether DNA repair deficient GEA have enhanced responsiveness to platinum chemotherapy and sensitivity to PARP inhibitors is not well characterized. MethodsUsing whole exome and genome sequencing data, we measured various HR deficiency-associated mutational signatures in patient specimen of gastric, esophageal and colorectal cancer specimens and gastric cancer cell lines. Gold-standard immunofluorescence assays were used to confirm HR and NER deficiency in cancer cell lines. The relationship between PARP inhibitor treatment and tumor response was evaluated in patients with gastric cancer. Drug sensitivity was determined using standard in vitro cell culture assays. Single-cell RNA-sequencing was performed to evaluate gastric cancer response to commonly used chemotherapeutics. ResultsWe found that a significant subset of GEA, but very few colorectal tumors, show evidence of HR deficiency by mutational signature analysis (HRD score). Gastric cancer cell lines with high HRD mutational signature scores demonstrated functional HR deficiency by RAD51 assay and increased sensitivity to platinum and PARP inhibitors. There was a positive association between HRD scores and tumor response in patients with gastric cancer treated with a PARP inhibitor on a clinical trial. A gastric cancer cell line with strong sensitivity to cisplatin showed HR proficiency but exhibited NER deficiency by DDB2 proteo-probe assay. Single-cell RNA-sequencing revealed that, in addition to inducing general apoptosis, cisplatin treatment triggered ferroptosis in a NER-deficient gastric cancer, which may explain the outlier sensitivity. ConclusionA subset of upper gastrointestinal tumors have genomic features of HR and NER deficiency and therefore may be more likely to benefit from platinum chemotherapy and PARP inhibition.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
6
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
8
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
9
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
10
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
13
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
21
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%