Back

Systematic comparison of culture media uncovers phenotypic shift of human microglia defined by reduced reliance to CSF1R signaling

Dorion, M.-F.; Yaqubi, M.; Murdoch, H. J.; Hall, J.; Dudley, R.; Antel, J. P.; Durcan, T. M.; Healy, L. M.

2022-07-14 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.07.14.500101 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Efforts to understand microglia function in health and diseases have been hindered by the lack of culture models that recapitulate in situ cellular properties. In recent years, the use of serum-free media with brain-derived growth factors (CSF1R ligands and TGF-{beta}1/2) have been favored for the maintenance of rodent microglia as they promote morphological features observed in situ. Here we study the functional and transcriptomic impacts of such media on human microglia. Media formulation had little impact on microglia transcriptome assessed by RNA sequencing which was sufficient to significantly alter microglia capacity to phagocytose myelin debris and to elicit an inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide. When compared to immediately ex vivo microglia from the same donors, the addition of fetal bovine serum to culture media, but not growth factors, was found to aid in the maintenance of key signature genes including those involved in phagocytic processes. A phenotypic shift characterized by CSF1R downregulation in culture correlated with a lack of reliance on CSF1R signaling for survival. Consequently, no improvement in cell survival was observed following culture supplementation with CSF1R ligands. Our study provides better understanding of human microglia in culture, with observations that diverge from those previously made in rodent microglia. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=181 SRC="FIGDIR/small/500101v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (28K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16ea011org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cef01dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f621aborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11c9f97_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.