Back

An Evaluation of the Safety and Immunogenicity of MVC-COV1901: Results of an interim analysis of a phase III, parallel group, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study

Barrios, L.; Garcia, L. A.; Torales, J.; Lin, M.-Y.; Estrada, J. A. G.; Estephan, L.; Cheng, H.-Y.; Chen, C.; Lien, C. E.

2022-07-15 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.07.14.22277617 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundData from previous studies of the MVC-COV1901 vaccine, a subunit vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 based on the stable prefusion spike protein (S-2P) adjuvanted with CpG 1018 adjuvant and aluminum hydroxide, suggest that the vaccine is generally safe and elicits a good immune response in healthy adults and adolescents. By comparing with AZD1222, this study adds to the findings from previous trials and further evaluates the breadth of protection offered by MVC-COV1901. MethodsIn this phase 3, parallel group, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial conducted in 2 sites in Paraguay, we assigned adults aged 18 to 91 years in a 1:1 ratio to receive intramuscular doses of MVC-COV1901 or AZD1222 administered as scheduled in the clinical trial. Serum samples were collected on the day of vaccination and 14 days after the second dose. Primary and secondary safety and immunogenicity endpoints were assessed. In addition, other outcomes investigated were cross-reactive immunity against the Omicron strain and the induction of IgG subclasses. ResultsA total of 1,030 participants underwent randomization. Safety data was derived from this set while primary immunogenicity data involved a per-protocol immunogenicity (PPI) subset including 225 participants. Among the participants, 58% are seropositive at baseline. When compared against AZD1222, MVC-COV1901 exhibited superiority in terms of neutralizing antibody titers and non-inferiority in terms of seroconversion rates. Reactogenicity was generally mild and no serious adverse event was attributable to MVC-COV1901. Both vaccines have a Th1-biased response predominated by the production of IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses. Omicron-neutralizing titers were 44.5 times lower compared to wildtype-neutralizing titers among seronegative individuals at baseline. This fold-reduction was 3.0 times among the seropositive. ConclusionResults presented here demonstrate the safe and robust immunogenicity from MVC-COV1901. Previous infection coupled with vaccination of this vaccine may offer protection against the Omicron strain though its durability is still unknown. ClinicalTrials.gov registrationNCT05011526

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
6
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
7
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
13
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
15
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Journal of Travel Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%