Back

Evolution of ipsilateral breast cancer decoded by proteogenomics

De Marchi, T.; Pyl, P. T.; Sjostrom, M.; Reinsbach, S. E.; DiLorenzo, S.; Nystedt, B.; Tran, L.; Pekar, G.; Warnberg, F.; Fredriksson, I.; Malmstrom, P.; Ferno, M.; Malmstrom, L.; Malmstrom, J.; Nimeus, E.

2022-07-14 cancer biology
10.1101/2022.07.13.499898 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) is a clinically important event, where an isolated in-breast recurrence is a potentially curable event but also associated with an increased risk of distant metastases and breast cancer death. It currently remains unclear if IBTRs are associated with molecular changes that can be explored as a resource for precision medicine strategies targeting locally recurring breast cancer. Here, we employed a recently developed proteogenomics workflow to analyze a cohort of 27 primary breast cancers and their matched IBTRs by whole genome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and mass spectrometry-based proteomics to define proteogenomic features of tumor evolution. Analysis of mutational signatures, copy number changes, and cancer specific mutations revealed a relationship with estrogen and progesterone receptor statuses and increased levels of genetic change. This in turn altered the re-programming of the transcriptome and proteome towards a recurring molecular disease phenotype with high replicating capacity and a higher degree of genomic instability possibly enhanced by high expression of APOBEC3B. In conclusion, this study defines how primary breast tumors differentially evolve into different ipsilateral recurrent malignancies depending on their key biomarker status, suggesting that further enhancing the genomic instability in some tumors could serve as an alternative treatment option.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.