Back

The Free Lunch is not over yet - Systematic Exploration of Numerical Thresholds in Phylogenetic Inference

Haag, J.; Hübner, L.; Kozlov, A. M.; Stamatakis, A.

2022-07-14 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.07.13.499893 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Maximum Likelihood (ML) is a widely used phylogenetic inference model. ML implementations heavily rely on numerical optimization routines that use internal numerical thresholds to determine convergence. We systematically analyze the impact of these threshold settings on the log-likelihood and runtimes for ML tree inferences with RAxML-NG, IQ-TREE, and FastTree on empirical datasets. We provide empirical evidence that we can substantially accelerate tree inferences with RAxML-NG and IQ-TREE by changing the default values of two such numerical thresholds. At the same time, altering these settings does not significantly impact the quality of the inferred trees. We further show that increasing both thresholds accelerates the RAxML-NG bootstrap without influencing the resulting support values. For RAxML-NG, increasing the likelihood thresholds{epsilon} LnL and{epsilon} brlen to 10 and 103 respectively results in an average tree inference speedup of 1.9 {+/-} 0.6 on Data collection 1, 1.8 {+/-} 1.1 on Data collection 2, and 1.9 {+/-} 0.8 on Data collection 2 for the RAxML-NG bootstrap. Increasing the likelihood threshold{epsilon} LnL to 10 in IQ-TREE results in an average tree inference speedup of 1.3 {+/-} 0.4 on Data collection 1 and 1.3 {+/-} 0.9 on Data collection 2.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.