Noise correlations in the owl optic tectum are differentially impacted by unimodal vs crossmodal competitors
Totten, D. J.; DeBello, W. M.
Show abstract
Multisensory integration in mammalian superior colliculus and its avian homolog, the optic tectum, is essential for rapid orienting towards salient stimuli. The benefits of combining across modalities is expected to depend in part on interneuronal noise correlations (NCs) and trial-to-trial response variance (Fano factor; FF), yet there is scant data on these topics. Here we used multielectrode arrays (MEAs) to record simultaneously from cohorts of single units in the deep layers of the owl optic tectum (OTd). Stimuli were presented individually or simultaneously as spatially aligned or non-aligned competitors. NC values varied from -0.35 to 0.94, an unexpectedly large range, and decreased only modestly as receptive fields diverged. Spatially aligned bimodal stimuli summed in a largely additive fashion over a wide range of response magnitudes. Most of the observed variance in bimodal NCs and FFs could be accounted for by an additive rule without accounting for internal noise. For non-aligned stimuli, crossmodal competitors decreased FFs, whereas unimodal competitors did not. Most striking, visual competitors decreased NCs for auditory drivers but increased NCs for visual drivers, indicating that the OTd network is differentially wired to process bimodal competitors. In total, these data provide novel descriptive information regarding the correlational structure of OTd neurons underlying multisensory processing. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTIn the owl auditory midbrain and its mammalian homologs, little is known regarding the ensemble response properties during multisensory integration. Using microelectrode arrays we found that noise correlations between pairs of neurons evoked by auditory, visual and bimodal stimuli were large and variable. When two non-aligned (competitor) stimuli were presented simultaneously, response reliability and noise correlations were driven down for crossmodal but not unimodal competitors, which suggests distinct processing strategies. This novel finding predicts that visual competitors drive an increase in localization accuracy for auditory targets.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pitch of Harmonic Complex Tones: Rate-Place Coding of Resolved Components in Harmonic and Inharmonic Complex Tones in Auditory Midbrain 97%
- Multiple timescales account for adaptive responses across sensory cortices 96%
- Acoustic context modulates natural sound discrimination in auditory cortex through frequency specific adaptation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hierarchical differences in the encoding of sound and choice in the subcortical auditory system 97%
- Visually-evoked activity and variable modulation of auditory responses in the macaque inferior colliculus 97%
- Neuronal responses in mouse inferior colliculus correlate with behavioral detection of amplitude modulated sound 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential rapid plasticity in auditory and visual responses in the primarily multisensory orbitofrontal cortex 97%
- Sound-evoked responses of distinct neuron classes from the tail of the striatum 96%
- Parallel lemniscal and non-lemniscal sources control auditory responses in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Corticothalamic Projections Deliver Enhanced-Responses to Medial Geniculate Body as a Function of the Temporal Reliability of the Stimulus 97%
- Cochlear nucleus small cells use olivocochlear collaterals to encode sounds in noise 95%
- Cortical Coding of Gustatory and Thermal Signals in Active Licking Mice 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.