Back

Generating dynamic carbon-dioxide from the respiratory-volume time series: A feasibility study using neural networks

Agrawal, V.; Zhong, X. Z.; Chen, J. J.

2022-07-13 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.07.11.499585 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In the context of fMRI, carbon dioxide (CO2) is a well-known vasodilator that has been widely used to monitor and interrogate vascular physiology. Moreover, spontaneous fluctuations in end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) reflects changes in arterial CO2 and has been demonstrated as the largest physiological noise source in the low-frequency range of the resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) signal. Increasing appreciation for the role of CO2 in fMRI has given rise to methods that use it for physiological denoising or estimating cerebrovascular reactivity. However, the majority of rs-fMRI studies do not involve CO2 recordings, and most often only heart rate and respiration are recorded. While the intrinsic link between these latter metrics and CO2 led to suggested possible analytical models, they have not been widely applied. In this proof-of-concept study, we propose a deep learning approach to reconstruct CO2 and PETCO2 data from respiration waveforms in the resting state. We demonstrate that the one-to-one mapping between respiration and CO2 recordings can be well predicted using fully convolutional networks (FCNs), achieving a Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of 0.946 {+/-} 0.056 with the ground truth CO2. Moreover, dynamic PETCO2 can be successfully derived from the predicted CO2, achieving r of 0.512 {+/-} 0.269 with the ground truth. Importantly, the FCN-based methods outperform previously proposed analytical methods. In addition, we provide guidelines for quality assurance of respiration recordings for the purposes of CO2 prediction. Our results demonstrate that dynamic CO2 can be obtained from respiration-volume using neural networks, complementing the still few reports in deep-learning of physiological fMRI signals, and paving the way for further research in deep-learning based bio-signal processing.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.