Networks of Phenological Synchrony Reveal a Highly Interconnected Ecosystem and Potential Vulnerability to Climate-Driven Mismatches
Garretson, A. C.; Feldsine, N.; Napoli, M.; Long, E. C.; Forkner, R. E.
Show abstract
As anthropogenic climate change alters species phenology, phenological shifts may cascade to disrupt species interactions to impact ecosystem functioning. We present a 108-year phenology dataset of 8,840 event dates for 251 phenophases for seven amphibian species, 58 birds, 14 insects, and 163 plant species, including 52 species introduced to New York. The dataset was collected at a single location in the Northeastern United States, providing continuity in monitoring since the early 1900s. We show that linear phenology analyses can underestimate the magnitude of phenological shift relative to circular methods, particularly for species experiencing extreme advancements. However, species phenologies are generally advancing, with faster advancements of insects and amphibians compared to birds and plants. Additionally, in our dataset, species with event dates later in the year are advancing more rapidly than species earlier in the year, and this relationship is stronger for animals than for plants. We present a novel, network-based approach for visualizing community and ecosystem-scale phenological synchrony. Using this approach, we find a high degree of synchrony between the monitored species, and this approach reveals that plants are more central in the phenological network, as well as species with phenological events earlier in the year. While many synchronous species are shifting at relatively similar rates and display similar temperature sensitivities, we highlight two species interactions potentially vulnerable to changing climate: Eastern Tent Caterpillars and Monarchs. Our results illustrate the utility of long-term ecological monitoring for investigating ecosystem responses to climate change and identifying potentially vulnerable phenological networks. Significance StatementThe purpose of this study is to understand how climate change has affected the phenology of an ecological community for over 100+ years. We present a novel approach to analyzing and visualizing community-level phenological data. We find that plants are central to phenological networks, as are species that flower, fruit, or undergo other phenological events earlier in the year. This is important because understanding which species are most central to an ecosystem, as well as which species are vulnerable to climate-driven mismatches (e.g., a butterfly emerges before the flowers that it feeds on bloom) that could cascade through an ecosystem.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Jack-of-all-trades paradigm meets long-term data: generalist herbivores are more widespread and locally less abundant 93%
- Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies 92%
- Phenotypic plasticity is aligned with phenological adaptation on both micro- and macroevolutionary timescales 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting species and community responses to global change in Australian mountain ecosystems using structured expert judgement 94%
- Substantial urbanization-driven declines of larval and adult moths in a subtropical environment 94%
- Increasing prevalence of plant-fungal symbiosis across two centuries of environmental change 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Forecasting the Effects of Global Change on a Bee Biodiversity Hotspot 93%
- Evaluating the efficacy of a consumer-centric method for ecological sampling: Using bonobo (Pan paniscus) feeding patterns as an instrument for tropical forest characterization 93%
- Prey-Driven Behavioral Habitat Use in a Low-Energy Ambush Predator 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.