Back

Cervical Spinal Cord Modulation with Repeated Epidural Stimulation in Healthy Adult Rats

Sharma, P.; Rampursaud, H.; Shah, P.

2022-07-19 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.07.11.498751 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The effects of spinal epidural stimulation (ES) in regaining various physiological functions after a spinal cord injury (SCI) are well documented. Spinal evoked motor responses (SEMR) are commonly utilized experimental outcomes in longitudinal pre-clinical and human studies to reflect the in-vivo physiological changes in neural networks secondary to a neurological insult or neuro-rehabilitative treatments utilizing ES. However, it remains unknown if the repeated exposure to ES during SEMRs testing itself modulates the spinal cord physiology and hence the SEMRs characteristics. To address this issue, cervical ES was delivered to the healthy adult rats cervical cord using standard stimulation paradigms during multiple sessions ([~]17 hours that spanned across 100 days). Cervical SEMR and electromyography (EMG) activity from forelimb muscles during a reaching & grasping task were collected before and after 100 days. We noted persistent increase in the cervical SEMR and forelimb muscle activity during reaching & grasping task relative to baseline at the end of the stimulation period indicating increased spinal and cortical excitability. Findings from the present work suggests that cervical SEMRs are amenable to modulation by routine ES testing protocols, with prominent changes in the mono and poly synaptic component of evoked responses. Additionally, since multiple testing sessions of cervical ES alone increases the excitability of the intact spinal cord, we suggest that SEMR data be used with caution to infer the physiological status of the spinal circuitry in longitudinal studies involving multiple SEMR testing sessions. Our findings also recommend involving appropriate control groups, motor behavior correlates, and practicing caution while utilizing normalization methods to allow meaningful functional interpretation of SEMR profiles following a SCI.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
2
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.9%
3
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
4
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.6%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 20%
5.6%
6
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
7
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
10
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.5%
12
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
13
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
15
Experimental Neurology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
20
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Pain Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%