Obtaining polygenic transcriptome risk scores (PTRS) directly from GWAS summary statistics
Liang, Y.
Show abstract
Polygenic Transcriptome Risk Scores (PTRS) are variations of Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) that use genetically predicted transcriptome as features for prediction instead of directly using genetic variants. We have shown that when PTRS is combined with PRS, they can yield improved prediction performance and portability across populations (Liang et al., 2022). Given the difficulty of training PTRS using large scale individual-level data (due to both computational burden and the lack of data access), we developed a user friendly software that infers PTRS using GWAS summary results and reference LD. We tested three summary statistics-based PTRS approaches: i) Clumping and thresholding (clump-PTRS), keeping trait associated genes while removing highly correlated ones; ii) Summary statistics-based elastic net PTRS (S-EN-PTRS), an extension of lassosum (Mak et al., 2017) to predicted transcriptome; iii) Naive-PTRS, the sum of predicted expressions of significantly associated genes weighted by PrediXcan-estimated effect sizes (Gamazon et al., 2015). Despite reports that individual-level trained elastic net PTRS outperformed clump-PTRS in (Liang et al., 2022), for most of the 11 traits used in the comparison, clump-PTRS outperformed S-EN-PTRS, which outperformed naive-PTRS.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- MetaPhat: Detecting and decomposing multivariate associations from univariate genome-wide association statistics 96%
- Impute.me: an open source, non-profit tool for using data from DTC genetic testing to calculate and interpret polygenic risk scores. 93%
- Machine Learning Approaches Identify Genes Containing Spatial Information from Single-Cell Transcriptomics Data. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating Comprehensive Functional Annotations to Boost Power and Accuracy in Gene-Based Association Analysis 96%
- A Fast and Scalable Framework for Large-scale and Ultrahigh-dimensional Sparse Regression with Application to the UK Biobank 96%
- Joint Modeling of Effect Sizes for Two Correlated Traits: Characterizing Trait Properties to Enhance Polygenic Risk Prediction 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.