Back

Altered visual evoked potentials associated with verbal and nonverbal skills in Fragile X syndrome.

Saoud, E.; Fitzgerald, J.; Hartney, M.; Wilkinson, C. L.

2022-07-10 pediatrics
10.1101/2022.07.10.22277277 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding the neurobiology behind Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is critical in identifying effective therapeutics and improving care for affected individuals. Electroencephalography (EEG) provides an opportunity to investigate the biological foundations of this disorder. We aimed to characterize the visual evoked potential (VEP) in young children with FXS, and to understand how measures of the VEP are associated with verbal and nonverbal development within FXS. MethodsVEPs were collected in children between 2-7 years old with FXS (n = 9) as well as corresponding age-(n = 10) and cognitive-matched (n = 9) typically developing children. Additionally, the Mullen Scales of Early Learning and Preschool Language Scales were administered to collect measures of verbal and nonverbal development. Differences in component amplitudes and latencies of the VEP were assessed using ANCOVAs, and associations of VEP measures and verbal and nonverbal development were evaluated using linear regression with age as a covariate. ResultsNo differences between groups were observed in N1, P1, or N2 VEP components. However, a consistent and prominent P2 component (latency = 177ms {+/-} 13.7), was observed in children with FXS. The P2 amplitude was significantly increased in FXS children compared to the cognitive-matched group (p = 0.004). For children with FXS, the amplitude of several VEP components were associated with verbal and nonverbal development; larger N1 amplitude and smaller P1 and P2 amplitudes were all associated with better receptive language (all p<0.05) and larger N1 amplitude was also associated with better fine motor skills (p<0.05). ConclusionsThe observed increase in P2 amplitude and its negative association with language development within the FXS group supports the P2 component as a potential biomarker for FXS as a disorder, as well as a pathophysiological marker of verbal impairment that could be used in clinical trials.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Autism Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.6%
6
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
7
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Pediatric Neurology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
9
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
14
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
15
The Cerebellum
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Molecular Autism
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
23
The Journal of Pediatrics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Epilepsia Open
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
29
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%