Back

Back to the Meadow Brown: eyespot variation and field temperature in a classic butterfly polymorphism

ffrench-Constant, R. H.; Rhodes, M.; Smith, D. A. S.; Mowbray, S.; Bennie, J. J.

2022-07-10 ecology
10.1101/2022.07.08.499313 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Since the classic work of E.B. Ford, alternate hypotheses have focused on explaining eyespot variation in the Meadow Brown butterfly strictly as a genetic polymorphism and the role of temperature in this classic example of natural selection has therefore been overlooked. Here we use large and continuous field collections from three sites in the UK to examine the effect of field temperature on total eyespot variation using the same presence/absence scoring as Ford. We show that higher developmental temperatures in the field lead to the disappearance of the spots visible while the butterfly is at rest, explaining Fords original observation that hindwing spotting declines across the season as temperatures increase. Analysis of wing damage supports the historical hypothesis that hindwing spots confuse aerial predators. However, as hindwing spotting declines over the season, a trade-off is suggested between their role in deflecting predators early in the season and their later developmental cost. In contrast, the large forewing eyespot is always present, scales with forewing length and its variation is best explained by day of the year rather than developmental temperature. As this large forewing spot is thought to be involved in startling predators, its constant presence is therefore likely required for defence. We model annual total spot variation with phenological data from the UK and derive predictions as to how spot patterns will continue to change under increasing summer temperatures, predicting that spotting will continue to decrease both across a single season and year or year as our climate warms. Summary statementWe show that a long-held example of genetic polymorphism, eyespot variation is the Meadow Brown butterfly, is correlated with field temperature during butterfly development.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.2%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
4
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
5
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
7
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.8%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
12
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
13
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
16
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
17
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
25
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%