Back

Molecular annotation of AOPs guides the development of the next generation mechanistic chemical safety assessment and new approach methods

Saarimaki, L. A.; Morikka, J.; Pavel, A.; Korpilahde, S.; del Giudice, G.; Federico, A.; Fratello, M.; Serra, A.; Greco, D.

2022-07-10 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2022.07.08.499301 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mechanistic toxicology has emerged as a powerful framework to inform on the safety of chemicals and guide the development of new safe-by-design compounds. Although toxicogenomics provides support towards mechanistic evaluation of chemical exposures, the implementation of toxicogenomics-based evidence in the regulatory setting is still hindered by uncertainties related to the analysis and interpretation of such data. Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) are multi-scale models that link chemical exposures to adverse outcomes through causal cascades of key events (KEs). The use of mechanistic evidence through the AOP framework is actively promoted for the development of new approach methods (NAMs) and to reduce animal experimentation. However, in order to unleash the full potential of AOPs and build confidence into toxicogenomics, robust and unified associations between KEs and patterns of molecular alteration need to be established. Here, we hypothesised that systematic curation of molecular events associated with KEs would enable the modelling of AOPs through gene-level data, creating the much-needed link between toxicogenomics and the systemic mechanisms depicted by the AOPs. This, in turn, introduces novel ways of benefitting from the AOP concept, including predictive models, read-across, and targeted assays, while also reducing the need for multiple testing strategies. Hence, we developed a multi-step strategy to annotate the AOPs relevant to human health risk assessment. We show that our framework successfully highlights relevant adverse outcomes for chemical exposures with strong in vitro and in vivo convergence, supporting chemical grouping and other data-driven approaches. Finally, we defined and experimentally validated a panel of robust AOP-derived in vitro biomarkers for pulmonary fibrosis.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
Archives of Toxicology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
Toxicological Sciences
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
5
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.5%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.2%
8
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
9
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Chemosphere
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
15
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
16
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.9%
19
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Journal of Hazardous Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
22
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.6%
23
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%