Pathway-specific inputs to the superior colliculus support flexible triggering of innate behaviors
Li, C.; Kuhn, N. K.; Alkislar, I.; Sans Dublanc, A.; Zemmouri, F.; Paesmans, S.; Reinhard, K.; Farrow, K.
Show abstract
Behavioral flexibility requires the ability to modify the feedforward transmission of sensory information. The superior colliculus mediates visually guided innate defensive behaviors via cell-type specific projections. However, how brain-wide inputs to the superior colliculus are organized to modulate visual processing and enable flexible behavior remains unknown. To determine these rules, we focused on inhibitory projection (Gad2) neurons. Trans-synaptic tracing and neuronal recordings revealed that Gad2 neurons projecting to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGd) and the parabigeminal nucleus (PBG) form two separate anatomical and functional populations, where each circuit received a different set of non-retinal inputs. Inhibiting LGd or PBG projecting Gad2 neurons resulted in opposing effects on behavior; increasing freezing or escape probability to visual looming stimuli, respectively. These data suggest that projection-specific sampling of brain-wide inputs provide a circuit design principle that enables feed-forward transfer of visual threat to be independently adjusted to produce context specific behavior.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal control of inhibition via muscarinic acetylcholine receptor signaling generates ON and OFF selectivity in a simple visual circuit 97%
- The superior colliculus gates dopamine responses to conditioned stimuli in visual classical conditioning 96%
- A synaptic mechanism for encoding the learned value of action-derived safety 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.