Osmotic, temperature, and cytotoxic damage in sea urchin oocytes
Olver, D. J.; Heres, P.; Paredes, E.; Benson, J. D.
Show abstract
Sea urchin (Paracentrotus lividus) oocytes are an important species for aquaculture and as a model species for multiple scientific fields. Despite their importance, methods of cryopreserved biobanking of oocytes are currently not possible. Optimized cryoprotectant loading may enable vitrification methods of cryopreservation and thus long-term storage of oocytes. Determining an optimized protocol requires membrane characteristics and models of damage associated with the vitrification loading protocol, namely osmotic, temperature, and cytotoxic damage. We present and experimentally evaluated state-of-the-art models alongside our novel models. We experimentally verify the damage models throughout time at difference treatment intensities. Osmotic damage experiments consisted of hypertonic solutions composed of seawater supplemented with NaCl or sucrose and hypotonic solutions composed of seawater diluted with deionized water. Treatment times ranged from 2 to 30 minutes. To test temperature damage (in particular chill injury), oocytes were exposed to 1.7 {degrees}C, 10 {degrees}C, and 20 {degrees}C (control) for exposure times ranging from 2 to 90 minutes. Cytotoxicity was investigated by exposing oocytes to solutions of Me2SO for exposure times ranging from 2 to 30 minutes. We identify appropriate models and use these to search for an optimal loading protocol, namely the time dependent osmotic damage model (for osmotic damage), the temperature dependent model (for temperature damage), and the external molality Arrhenius power model (for cytotoxicity). We combined these models to estimate total damage during a cryopreservation loading protocol and performed a exhaustive grid search for optimal loading for a given goal intracellular cryoprotectant concentration. Given our fitted models, we find sea urchin oocytes can only be loaded to 0.13 Me2SO v/v with a 50% survival, For reference, levels for vitrification are approximately 0.45 v/v. Our synthesis of damages is the first of its kind, and enables a fundamentally novel approach to modelling survival for cells in general.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An experimental-mathematical approach to predict tumor cell growth as a function of glucose availability in breast cancer cell lines 91%
- Temperature-dependence of Early Development of Zebrafish and the Consequences for Laboratory Use and Animal Welfare 91%
- Identification and selection of optimal reference genes for qPCR-based gene expression analysis in Fucus distichus under various abiotic stresses 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of selected abiotic factors on zooplankton hatching process through real-time, in-situ observation 91%
- Frequency-dependent interactions determine outcome of competition between two breast cancer cell lines 91%
- High throughput method for simultaneous screening of membrane permeability and toxicity for discovery of new cryoprotective agents 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimation of sinking velocities using free-falling dynamically scaled models: foraminifera as a test case 91%
- Frequency-dependent viscosity of salmon ovarian fluid has biophysical implications for sperm-egg interactions 91%
- Depression of heart rate in fish at critically high temperatures is due to atrioventricular block 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantification of long-term doxorubicin response dynamics in breast cancer cell lines to direct treatment schedules 91%
- Dose-dependent thresholds of dexamethasone destabilize CAR T-cell treatment efficacy 91%
- Interplay scenarios between CatSper and CaV channels in sea urchin sperm flagellum signaling cascades triggered by egg peptides: a mathematical modelling approach 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.