Timing of blood draws among hospitalized patients: An evaluation of the electronic health records from a large health care system
Caraballo, C.; Mahajan, S.; Huang, C.; Aneja, S.; Murugiah, K.; Mortazavi, B. J.; Lu, Y.; Khera, R.; Krumholz, H.
Show abstract
ImportanceEarly morning blood draws disrupt patients sleep and adversely affect patient experience. ObjectiveTo describe the trends in non-urgent early morning blood draws in a large health care system. DesignThis cross-sectional study analyzed trends in non-urgent early morning (04:00-06:59) blood draws using the electronic medical records of patients hospitalized between November 2016 and October 2019. SettingThe study was done at Yale New Haven Health System, which is Connecticuts largest health care system consisting of 5 hospitals. ParticipantsWe included all blood draw events for hospitalized adult patients ([≥]18 years at the time of admission). Main outcome and measuresWe assessed the timing of non-urgent (excluding blood draws performed in the emergency department, critical care units, step-down units, and during the first 24 hours of admission) blood draws among hospitalized patients and determined if the trends of early morning (04:00-06:59) blood draws varied by patient characteristics or over the study duration. ResultsOf the 5,676,802 blood draw events included, 38.9% occurred between 04:00-06:59 with only modest differences across age, race and ethnicity, and gender subgroups. The proportion of early morning blood draws increased over the study period from 36.9% to 41.4% (P<0.001). Of the early morning samples, those collected between 04:00-04:59 decreased from 25.6% to 18.5%, those collected between 05:00-05:59 increased from 39.6% to 45.5%, and those collected between 06:00-06:59 increased from 34.6% to 36.0% (P<0.001, each). Conclusions and relevanceThe proportion of non-urgent early morning blood draws was persistently high over 3 years. There is a need to redesign hospital care to reduce sleep interruptions from non-urgent interventions. KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat are the trends in non-urgent early morning (04:00-06:59) blood draws among non-critically ill hospitalized patients across a large health care system? FindingsThis cross-sectional study showed that 38.9% of all blood draws occurred between 04:00-06:59, with only modest differences across age, race and ethnicity, and gender subgroups. The proportion of early morning blood draws increased over the study period from 36.9% to 41.4% (P<0.001). MeaningThe proportion of non-urgent early morning blood draws remains persistently high, suggesting a need to redesign hospital care to reduce sleep interruptions from non-urgent interventions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 92%
- A clinical trial to evaluate the dayzz smartphone app on employee sleep, health, and productivity at a large US employer 91%
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Safety of Home Oximetry for Covid-19: A multi-site retrospective observational study 92%
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 91%
- Performance of the Safer Nursing Care Tool to measure nurse staffing requirements in acute hospitals: a multi-centre observational study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disseminating sleep education to graduate psychology programs online: A knowledge translation study to improve the management of insomnia 92%
- Changes of evening exposure to electronic devices during the COVID-19 lockdown affect the time course of sleep disturbances 92%
- Performance of an Electroencephalography-Measuring Headband or Actigraphy Compared with Polysomnography in Older Adults with Sleep Disturbances 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sleeping under the waves: a longitudinal study across the contagion peaks of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy 91%
- Two years after lockdown: longitudinal trajectories of sleep disturbances and mental health over the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of age, gender, and chronotype 91%
- Sleep improvement for metabolic health: A feasibility trial of a digital sleep treatment in people with insomnia and non-diabetic hyperglycaemia. 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.