Back

Loss of regulation of complement C5 activation in HIV associated Preeclampsia

Govender, S.; Mduluza, T.; Nandlal, L.; Naicker, T.

2022-07-10 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2022.07.06.22277325 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveMaternal mortality remains a global health concern in developing countries that are also affected by HIV infection. Complement components are anaphylatoxin that mediate several growth factors necessary during pregnancy. An extensive stimulation of the complement system contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia; hence its inhibition facilitates a successful pregnancy. The study evaluated the expression of complement components C2 and C5a in HIV and the association with preeclampsia. Materials and MethodsSerum samples were collected from 76 pregnant women of which 38 were preeclamptic and 38 normotensive pregnant. The participants were further stratified according to HIV infection status. Bio-Plex multiplex immunoassay method was used to quantify serum concentration of C5a and C2 complement components. ResultsThe C2 complement concentration was not significantly different between preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women, irrespective of HIV status as well as pregnancy type. However, based on preeclamptic vs normotensive pregnancy type, the expression of C5a was significantly different (p = 0.05). The C5a levels were downregulated in preeclampsia compared to normotensive women, irrespective of HIV status. Both C2 and C5a concentrations did not differ across all study groups. ConclusionThis novel study reports a loss of regulation of complement activation shown by the downregulation of C5a in preeclamptic compared to normotensive pregnant women, regardless of HIV status. Complement dysregulation affects the host innate defence, and as a consequence, intensifies placental and fetal injury. Moreover, HIV status did not influence the expression of both C5a and C2, irrespective of pregnancy type, this may be attributed to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.8%
2
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
5
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
14
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
17
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
COVID
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Archives of Virology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
25
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
27
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%