Synthesis reveals biotic homogenisation and differentiation are both common
Blowes, S.; McGill, B.; Brambilla, V.; Chow, C. F. Y.; Engel, T.; Fontrodona-Eslava, A.; Martins, I. S.; McGlinn, D.; Moyes, F.; Sagouis, A.; Shimadzu, H.; van Klink, R.; Xu, W.-B.; Gotelli, N. J.; Magurran, A.; Dornelas, M.; Chase, J.
Show abstract
It is commonly thought that the biodiversity crisis includes widespread decreases in the uniqueness of different sites in a landscape (biotic homogenization). Using a typology relating homogenization and differentiation to local and regional diversity changes, we synthesize patterns across 283 metacommunities surveyed for 10-91 years, and 54 species checklists (13-500+ years). On average, there is a 0.2% increase in species shared among communities/year (i.e., weak homogenization), but across data sets, differentiation frequently occurs, with no statistically significant change being most common. Local (not regional) diversity frequently underlies composition change, and homogenization is strongly associated with checklist data that have longer durations and large spatial scales. Conservation and management can benefit from the multiscale perspective used here as it disentangles the implications of both the differentiation and homogenization currently unfolding. One-Sentence SummaryBiotic homogenization is most prevalent at large temporal and spatial scales.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.