On the automaticity of visual statistical learning
Himberger, K. D.; Finn, A. S.; Honey, C. J.
Show abstract
Humans can extract regularities from their environment, enabling them to recognize and predict sequences of events. The process of regularity extraction is called statistical learning and is generally thought to occur rapidly and automatically; that is, regularities are extracted from repeated stimulus presentations, without intent or awareness, as long as the stimuli are attended. We hypothesized that visual statistical learning is not entirely automatic, even when stimuli are attended, and that the learning depends on the extent to which viewers process the relationships between stimuli. To test this, we measured statistical learning performance across seven conditions in which participants (N=774) viewed image sequences. As task instructions across conditions increasingly required participants to attend to relationships between stimuli, their learning performance increased from chance to robust levels. We conclude that the learning observed in visual statistical learning paradigms is, for the most part, not automatic and requires more than passively attending to stimuli.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.