Automatically producing large morphometric datasets from natural history collection images: a case study of Lepidoptera wing shape
Ginot, S.; Debat, V.
Show abstract
Publicly available image data (2D and 3D) from biological specimens is becoming extremely widespread, notably following digitization efforts from natural history institutions worldwide. To deal with this huge amount of data, high-throughput phenotyping methods are being developed by researchers, to extract biologically meaningful data, in correlation with the burgeoning of the field of phenomics. Here we explore the potential of a combination of simple image treatment algorithms, with a geometric morphometrics contour analysis, applicable to strongly standardized images such as collections of Lepidotera. Using a previously manually landmarked dataset of Morpho butterflies, we show that our automated approach can produce a morphospace similar to that produced by a manual approach. Although the former is more noisy than the latter, it appears to pick up phylogenetic and to some extent ecological signal. Applying then the same approach to a large dataset of images from two different museums, we produce a morphospace containing >5000 specimens, representing 851 species in 24 families of butterflies and moths. The most notable feature of this space is that Sphingidae morphology is clearly separate from the rest, and appears much more constrained. We also show some indirect evidence that at this large interspecific level, potential museum related bias (e.g. inter-user bias in specimen preparation and photography) can be negligible. Altogether, our results suggest that this approach has the potential to produce large-scale analysis of morphology, and could be refined to include more specimens.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A pipeline for assessing the quality of iNaturalist data and images and the importance of metadata and image quality control when using crowd-sourced databases. 95%
- The impact of allometry on vomer shape and its implications for the taxonomy and cranial kinesis of crown-group birds 95%
- Museomics of Carabus giant ground beetles shows an Oligocene origin and in situ Alpine diversification 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Image-based taxonomic classification of bulk biodiversity samples using deep learning and domain adaptation 95%
- Phylogenomic Analysis of Protein-Coding Genes Resolves Complex Gall Wasp Relationships 93%
- A transcriptome-based phylogeny of Scarabaeoidea confirms the sister group relationship of dung beetles and phytophagous pleurostict scarabs (Coleoptera) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Schrödinger's phenotypes: herbarium specimens show two-dimensional images are both good and (not so) bad sources of morphological data 95%
- rphenoscate: An R package for semantic-aware evolutionary analyses of anatomical traits 94%
- PicoCam: High-resolution 3D imaging of live animals and preserved specimens 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Three-dimensional fossils of a Cretaceous collared carpet shark (Parascylliidae, Orectolobiformes) shed light on skeletal evolution in galeomorphs 91%
- Bayesian tip dating reveals heterogeneous morphological clocks in Mesozoic birds 90%
- New fossils of Jurassic ophiurid brittle stars (Ophiuroidea; Ophiurida) provide evidence for early clade evolution in the deep sea 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.