Phase 2 randomised placebo-controlled trial of spironolactone and dexamethasone versus dexamethasone in COVID-19 hospitalised patients in Delhi
Wadhwa, B.; Malhotra, V.; Kerai, S.; Husain, F.; Pandey, N. B.; Saxena, K. N.; Singh, V.; Quinn, T. M.; Li, F.; Gaughan, E.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Mills, B.; Antonelli, J.; Bruce, A.; Finlayson, K.; Moore, A.; Dhaliwal, K.; Edwards, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn this phase 2 randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial, we hypothesised that blocking mineralocorticoid receptors with spironolactone in patients with COVID-19 is safe and may reduce illness severity. MethodsHospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19 were randomly allocated to low dose oral spironolactone (50mg day 1, then 25mg once daily for 21 days) or standard care in a 2:1 ratio. Both groups received dexamethasone 6mg for 10 days. Group allocation was blinded to the patient and research team. Primary outcomes were time to recovery, defined as the number of days until patients achieved WHO Ordinal Scale (OS) category [≤] 3, and the effect of spironolactone on aldosterone, D-dimer, angiotensin II and Von Willebrand Factor (VWF). Results120 patients were recruited in Delhi from 01 February to 30 April 2021. 74 were randomly assigned to spironolactone and dexamethasone (SpiroDex), and 46 to dexamethasone alone (Dex). There was no significant difference in the time to recovery between SpiroDex and Dex groups (SpiroDex median 4.5 days, Dex median 5.5 days, p = 0.055). SpiroDex patients had lower aldosterone levels on day 7 and lower D-dimer levels on days 4 and 7 (day 7 D-dimer mean SpiroDex 1.15{micro}g/mL, Dex 3.15 {micro}g/mL, p = 0.0004). There was no increase in adverse events in patients receiving SpiroDex. Post hoc analysis demonstrated reduced clinical deterioration (pre specified as escalating to WHO OS category >4) in the SpiroDex group vs Dex group (5.4% vs 19.6%). ConclusionLow dose oral spironolactone in addition to dexamethasone was safe and reduced D-Dimer and aldosterone. Although time to recovery was not significantly reduced, fewer patients progressed to severe disease. Phase 3 randomised controlled trials with spironolactone should be considered.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients admitted with COVID-19 in East London: a retrospective cohort analysis 92%
- Phase 2 Study Design and Analysis Approach for BBT-877: An Autotaxin Inhibitor Targeting Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis 92%
- Post-COVID assessment in a specialist clinical service: a 12-month, single-centre analysis of symptoms and healthcare needs in 1325 individuals 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of propolis as an adjunct treatment for hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a randomized, controlled clinical trial 94%
- Changes in serum CXCL13 levels are associated with outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing First-Line Oxaliplatin-Based Treatment 90%
- Ex-vivo mucolytic and anti-inflammatory activity of BromAc in tracheal aspirates from COVID-19 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide combined with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 95%
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- The Association Between Alpha-1 Adrenergic Receptor Antagonists and In-Hospital Mortality from COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Doxycycline for the prevention of progression of COVID-19 to severe disease requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission: a randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group trial (DOXPREVENT.ICU) 95%
- Safety and effectiveness of RBD-specific polyclonal equine F(ab′)2 fragments for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 disease: a retrospective cohort study 95%
- Hydroxychloroquine For The Treatment Of Severe Respiratory Infection By COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.