Back

Sonographic Diaphragm Dysfunction is an Unexpectedly Frequent Feature of Long COVID with Non-Specific Dyspnea and Fatigue

Deo, P. P.; Bailey, J. I.; Farr, E.; Fahey, M.; Isherwood, M.; Chakka, K.; Wolfe, L. F.; Roy, I.; Sala, M. A.; Franz, C. K.

2022-06-29 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2022.06.29.22277054 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction/AimsThe primary aim of this study is to define the sonographic diaphragm phenotype of Long COVID rehabilitation outpatients with non-specific dyspnea and fatigue. We analyzed patients referred from a pulmonary post-COVID clinic that were lacking a specific cardiopulmonary diagnosis for their symptoms. Additionally, we report the functional outcomes of subset of patients who completed an outpatient cardiopulmonary physical therapy program. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study (n = 58) of consecutive patients referred for neuromuscular ultrasound assessment of diaphragm muscle using B-mode technique. Patients were recruited from a single academic hospital between February 25, 2021 and November 22, 2022. ResultsSonographic abnormalities were identified in 57% (33/58) of patients, and in the vast majority of cases (33/33) was defined by a low diaphragm muscle thickness. Thinner diaphragm muscles are correlated with lower serum creatinine and creatine kinase values, but there was no association with markers of systemic inflammation. Thirty three patients participated in outpatient cardiopulmonary physical therapy that included respiratory muscle training, and 75.8% (25/33) had documented improvement. DiscussionIn the outpatient rehabilitation setting, patients with Long COVID display low diaphragm muscle thickness, but intact muscle contractility, with surprising frequency on neuromuscular ultrasound. We speculate this represents a form of disuse atrophy. Also, these patients appear to have a favorable response to cardiopulmonary physical therapy that includes respiratory muscle training.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.