Modelling Instantaneous Firing Rate of DBS Target Neuronal Ensembles in Basal Ganglia and Thalamus
Tian, Y.; Murphy, M. J. H.; Steiner, L. A.; Kalia, S.; Hodaie, M.; Lozano, A.; Hutchison, W. D.; Popovic, M.; Milosevic, L.; Lankarany, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveDeep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders, including Parkinsons disease and essential tremor. However, the underlying mechanisms of DBS remain elusive. Despite the capability of existing models in interpreting experimental data qualitatively, there are very few unified computational models that quantitatively capture the dynamics of the neuronal activity of varying stimulated nuclei--including subthalamic nucleus (STN), substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) and ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim)--across different DBS frequencies. Materials and MethodsBoth synthetic and experimental data were utilized in the model fitting; the synthetic data were generated by an established spiking neuron model that was reported in our previous work 1, and the experimental data were provided using single-unit microelectrode recordings (MER) during DBS (microelectrode stimulation). Based on these data, we developed a novel mathematical model to represent the firing rate of neurons receiving DBS, including neurons in STN, SNr and Vim--across different DBS frequencies. In our model, the DBS pulses were filtered through a synapse model and a nonlinear transfer function to formulate the firing rate variability. For each DBS-targeted nucleus, we fitted a single set of optimal model parameters consistent across varying DBS frequencies. ResultsOur model accurately reproduced the firing rates observed and calculated from both synthetic and experimental data. The optimal model parameters were consistent across different DBS frequencies. ConclusionThe result of our model fitting were in agreement with experimental single-unit microelectrode recording data during DBS. Reproducing neuronal firing rates of different nuclei of the basal ganglia and thalamus during DBS can be helpful to further understand the mechanisms of DBS, and to potentially optimize stimulation parameters based on their actual effects on neuronal activity.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) triggers dose-dependent homeostatic rewiring in recurrent neuronal networks 94%
- In silico model of basal ganglia Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinsons Disease captures range of effective parameters for pathological beta power suppression 94%
- Selection of stimulus parameters for enhancing slow wave sleep events with a Neural-field theory thalamocortical computational model 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved alpha-beta power reduction via combined Electrical and Ultrasonic stimulation in a Parkinsonian Cortex-Basal Ganglia-Thalamus Computational Model 94%
- Deep brain stimulation pulse sequences to optimally modulate frequency-specific neural activity 94%
- Robust and accurate decoding of hand kinematics from entire spiking activity using deep learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal interference stimulation targets deep brain regions by modulating neural oscillations 93%
- Neural mechanisms of the temporal response of cortical neurons to intracortical microstimulation 93%
- Real-time suppression and amplification of frequency-specific neural activity using stimulation evoked oscillations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multiscale, Systems-level, Neuropharmacological Model of Cortico-Basal Ganglia System for Arm Reaching under Normal, Parkinsonian and Levodopa Medication Conditions 92%
- Explosive Synchronization-Based Brain Modulation Reduces Hypersensitivity in The Brain Network: A Computational Model Study 92%
- Synergy mediates Long-Range Correlations in the Visual Cortex Near Criticality 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.