Back

Non-invasive quantification of contractile dynamics in cardiac cells, spheroids and organs-on-a-chip using high frequency ultrasound

Strohm, E. M.; Callaghan, N. I.; Latifi, N.; Rafatian, N.; Funakoshi, S.; Fernandes, I.; Radisic, M.; Keller, G.; Kolios, M.; Simmons, C. A.

2022-07-01 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.06.28.497094 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cell-based models that mimic in vivo heart physiology are poised to make significant advances in cardiac disease modeling and drug discovery. In these systems, cardiomyocyte (CM) contractility is an important functional metric, but current measurement methods are inaccurate, low-throughput, or require complex set-ups. To address this need, we developed a standalone non-invasive, label-free ultrasound technique operating at 40-200 MHz to measure the beat rate, beat rhythm, and force of contraction of cardiac models, ranging from single adult CMs to 3D microtissue constructs in standard cell culture formats. The high temporal resolution of 1000 fps resolved the beat profile of single mouse CMs paced at up to 9 Hz, revealing limitations of lower speed optical based measurements to resolve beat kinetics or characterize aberrant beats. Coupling of ultrasound with traction force microscopy enabled the measurement of CM longitudinal modulus and facile estimation of adult mouse CM contractile forces of 2.34 {+/-} 1.40 N, comparable to more complex measurement techniques. Similarly, measurements of beat rate, rhythm, and drug responses of CM spheroid and microtissue models were demonstrated. In conclusion, ultrasound can be used for the rapid characterization of CM contractile function in a wide range of commonly-studied configurations ranging from single cells to 3D tissue constructs using standard well plates, with applications in cardiac drug discovery and cardiotoxicity evaluation.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.