Ancient midbrain inhibitory neurons control selective spatial attention
Kothari, N. B.; You, W.-K.; Banerjee, A.; Zhang, Q.; Mysore, S. P.
Show abstract
To behave adaptively in complex environments, animals must selectively process the most important information in space while ignoring distractors. Contrary to the dominant cortico-centric view, we report that an evolutionarily old group of inhibitory neurons in the brainstem, called PLTi, is critical for this function of selective spatial attention. In freely behaving mice performing a human-like spatial attention task, we found that bilateral silencing of PLTi severely disrupted target selection without causing perceptual or motor impairments. PLTis effects depended necessarily on goal-relevant, rather than just physical salience-based signals, together revealing it as a dedicated brain site for priority-driven attentional target selection. PLTis core computational function is its explicit implementation of the abstract cognitive decision boundary separating target from distracters: it controlled the accuracy and categorical precision of this decision boundary, doing so by shaping neural representations of competing stimuli in the superior colliculus, a major sensorimotor hub. PLTi may, therefore, be a conserved brainstem engine across vertebrates for winner-take-all-like spatial decisions in goal-driven behavior.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Topographically organized representation of space and context in the medial prefrontal cortex 97%
- Brain-wide genetic mapping identifies the indusium griseum as a prenatal and shared target of pharmacologically-unrelated psychostimulants 97%
- Chromatin remodeler Arid1a regulates subplate neuron identity and wiring of cortical connectivity 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.