Back

Investigating the mechanistic role of painful self-experience in emotional contagion: an effect of auto-conditioning?

Packheiser, J.; Soyman, E.; Paradiso, E.; Ramaaker, E.; Sahin, N.; Muralidharan, S.; Wohr, M.; Gazzola, V.; Keysers, C.

2022-06-29 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2022.06.27.497737 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Emotional contagion refers to the transmission of emotions from one conspecific to another. Previous research in rodents has demonstrated that the self-experience of footshocks enhances how much an observer is affected by the emotional state of a conspecific in pain or distress. We hypothesized auditory auto-conditioning to contribute to this enhancement: during the observers own experience of shocks, the animal associates its own audible nocifensive responses, i.e. its pain squeaks, with the negative affective state induced by the shock. When the animal later witnesses a cage mate receive shocks and hears it squeak, the previously strengthened connection between fear and squeaks could be a mechanism eliciting the enhanced fearful response in the observer. As hypothesized, in a first study, we found pre-exposure to shocks to increase freezing and 22 kHz vocalizations associated with distress upon the playback of pain squeaks. Freezing was also increased during the playbacks of phase-scrambled squeaks, but 22 kHz calls were more frequent during the playback of regular squeaks. Core to the notion of auto-conditioning is that the effect of pre-exposure is due to the pairing of a pain-state with hearing ones own pain squeaks. In a second study, we therefore compared the response to squeak playbacks after animals had been pre-exposed to pairings of a CO2 laser with a squeak playback against three control groups that were pre-exposed to the CO2 laser alone, to squeak playbacks alone or to neither of these conditions. We however could not find any differences in freezing or 22 kHz calls among all experimental groups. In summary, we demonstrate the sufficiency of pain squeaks to trigger fear in a way that critically depends on the nature of an animals prior experience and discuss why the pairing of a CO2 laser with pain squeaks cannot substitute footshock pre-exposure.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
18.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.5%
3
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.3%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.3%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
8
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
9
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
10
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
13
Current Research in Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
14
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%
22
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
25
Journal of General Physiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
26
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
28
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
29
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%