Back

Differential migration mechanics and immune responses of glioblastoma subtypes

Shamsan, G. A.; Liu, C. J.; Braman, B. C.; Rathe, S. K.; Sarver, A. L.; Ghaderi, N.; McMahon, M. M.; Klank, R. L.; Tschida, B. R.; McFarren, S. J.; Rosato, P. C.; Masopust, D.; Sarkaria, J. N.; Clark, H. B.; Rosenfeld, S. S.; Largaespada, D. A.; Odde, D. J.

2022-06-29 cancer biology
10.1101/2022.06.26.497270 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glioblastoma remains a deadly cancer driven in part by invasion of tumor cells into the brain. Transcriptomic analyses have identified distinct molecular subtypes, but mechanistic differences that account for clinical differences are not clear. Here, we show that, as predicted by the motor-clutch model of cell migration, mesenchymal glioma cells are more spread, generate larger traction forces, and migrate faster in brain tissue compared to proneural cells. Despite their rapid migration and comparable proliferation rates in vitro, mice with mesenchymal tumors survive longer than those with proneural tumors. This improved survival correlated with an immune response in the mesenchymal tumors, including T cell-mediated. Consistently, inducing mesenchymal tumors in immunodeficient mice resulted in shorter survival supporting a protective immune role in mesenchymal tumors. Thus, mesenchymal tumors have aggressive migration, but are immunologically hot which suppresses net proliferation. These two features counteract each other and may explain the lack of a strong survival difference between subtypes clinically, while also opening up new opportunities for subtype-specific therapies. Significant StatementThis study highlights new mechanical and immunological insights into glioblastoma molecular subtypes using an integrated modeling-genome engineering strategy, which can potentially facilitate glioblastoma subtype-specific therapeutic strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.