Neurons In The Postrhinal Cortex Encode Nonspatial Context During Visual Biconditional Discrimination
Heimer-McGinn, V. R.; Trettel, S. G.; Kent, B.; Singh, A. N.; Burwell, R. D.
Show abstract
Spatial context, or the physical surroundings that form the background of an experience, is an essential component of episodic memory. The rodent postrhinal cortex and its primate homolog, the parahippocampal cortex, are thought to preferentially process visuospatial information to represent the spatial features of contexts and scenes. In this study, we addressed open questions about postrhinal function and about how context modulates behavior and cognition. The first question was whether the postrhinal cortex also represents nonspatial contexts. The second question was how representations of context might interact with other cues in the environment. We recorded postrhinal neurons as rats performed a visual nonspatial biconditional discrimination task in which the pattern on the floor determined which object in a pair was correct. Critically, this task design allowed dissociation of location from non-spatial context. We found that postrhinal ensembles and neurons signaled changes in non-spatial context and coded for conjunctions of non-spatial context and objects. Importantly, postrhinal neurons coded for conjunctions of context and objects more often than they coded for conjunctions of location and object. The pattern of findings suggests that postrhinal representations of context may behave like occasion setters by modulating the meaning of other cues in the environment.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging place field repetition to understand positional versus nonpositional inputs to hippocampal field CA1 97%
- Differential processing of decision information in subregions of rodent medial prefrontal cortex 96%
- Population analyses reveal heterogenous encoding in the medial prefrontal cortex during naturalistic foraging 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.