A Single Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Session to Enhance Sport-Specific Performance in Trained Individuals? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Maudrich, T.; Ragert, P.; Perrey, S.; Kenville, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a promising and feasible method to improve motor performance in healthy and clinical populations. However, the potential of tDCS to enhance sport-specific motor performance in athletes remains elusive. ObjectiveWe aimed at analyzing the acute effects of a single anodal tDCS session on sport-specific motor performance changes in athletes compared to sham. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus with publication dates through April 2022. The meta-analysis was performed using an inverse variance method and a random-effects model. Additionally, two subgroup analyses were conducted (1) depending on the stimulated brain areas (i.e., primary motor cortex (M1), temporal cortex (TC), prefrontal cortex (PFC), cerebellum (CB)), and (2) studies clustered in subgroups according to different sports performance domains (endurance, strength, and visuomotor skill). ResultsA total number of 18 studies enrolling a sample size of 245 athletes were deemed eligible for inclusion. Across all included studies, a significant moderate standardized mean difference (SMD) favoring anodal tDCS to enhance sport-specific motor performance could be observed (SMD = 0.27, 95%CI [0.10, 0.44], p = 0.002). Subgroup analysis depending on cortical target areas of tDCS indicated non-significant moderate to high SMD in favor of anodal tDCS compared to sham for M1 (SMD = 0.24, 95%CI [-0.01, 0.49], p = 0.06), TC (SMD = 0.40, 95%CI [-0.10, 0.89], p = 0.12), PFC (SMD = 0.23, 95%CI [-0.04, 0.50], p = 0.09) and CB (SMD = 0.89, 95%CI [-0.15, 1.94], p = 0.09). Performance domain subgroup analysis revealed non-significant moderate SMD favoring anodal tDCS compared to sham: endurance domain (SMD = 0.23, 95%CI [-0.01, 0.47], p = 0.06), strength domain (SMD = 0.44, 95%CI [-0.14, 1.01], p = 0.14, Chi2 = 0.31) and visuomotor skill domain (SMD = 0.30, 95%CI [-0.03, 0.62], p = 0.07). ConclusionA single anodal tDCS session leads to performance enhancement in athletes in sport-specific motor tasks. Although no conclusions can be drawn regarding the modes of action as a function of performance domain or stimulation site, these results imply intriguing possibilities concerning sports performance enhancement. Furthermore, this study highlights the need to investigate tDCS applications under real-life conditions rather than in highly controlled laboratory settings to uncover the true potential of non-invasive brain stimulation as a performance enhancement not only in sports but also in the context of prevention or rehabilitation of neurological diseases.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of aerobic physical exercise on depression symptoms in adults: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials 94%
- Anodal M1 tDCS enhances online learning of rhythmic timing videogame skill 94%
- Characteristics of motor evoked potentials in patients with peripheral vascular disease. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immediate effect of osteopathic techniques on human resting muscle tone in healthy subjects using myotonometry: A factorial randomized trial 94%
- Perception of yips among professional Japanese golfers: perspectives and challenges 92%
- An acute session of motor imagery training induces use-dependent plasticity. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying paddling kinematic through muscle activation and whole body coordination during maximal sprint of different duration on a kayak ergometer: a pilot study 91%
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 91%
- Non-pharmacological therapies for post-viral syndromes, including Long COVID: A systematic review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modulation of prefrontal functional connectivity by anodal tDCS over left DLPFC predicts performance enhancement in competitive swimmers: A simultaneous tDCS-fNIRS, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover study 94%
- Test-retest reliability of TMS motor evoked responses and silent periods during explosive voluntary isometric contractions. 92%
- Single-session measures of quadriceps neuromuscular function are reliable in healthy females and unaffected by age 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.