Back

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-reported 12-month pneumococcal vaccination series completion rates in Canada: An interrupted time-series analysis

Atkinson, K. M.; Ntacyabukura, B.; Hawken, S.; Laflamme, L.; Wilson, K.

2022-06-22 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2022.06.21.22276720 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRoutine childhood vaccination improves health and prevents morbidity and mortality from vaccination preventable diseases. There are indications that the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted vaccination rates globally, but systematic studies on this are still lacking in Canada. This study aims to add knowledge on the effect of the pandemic on pneumococcal vaccination rates of children using self-reported immunization data entered into the CANImmunize digital vaccination tool. MethodologyAn interrupted time series analysis was conducted on aggregated monthly enrollment of children on the platform (2016-2021) and their pneumococcal immunization series completion rates (2016-2020). Predicted trends before and after the onset of the COVID-19 related restriction (March 1, 2020) were compared by means of an Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA). ResultsPandemic restrictions were associated with changes in self-reported pneumococcal immunization rates amongst the users of the CANImmunize platform. The monthly enrollment of children on the platform decreased by - 1177.52 records (95% CI: -1865.47, - 489.57), with a continued decrease of 80.84 records each month. Self-reported pneumococcal immunization series completion rates had an immediate increase of 14.57% (95% CI 4.64, 24.51) followed by a decrease of -3.54% each month. ConclusionThe onset of the COVID-19 related restrictions impacted enrollment of children in the CANImmunize digital immunization platform, and an overall decrease in self-reported pneumococcal immunization series completion rates. Our findings support that efforts to increase catch-up immunization campaigns so that children who could not get scheduled immunization during the pandemic are not missed.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.