The domain-separation low-dimensional language network dynamics in the resting-state support the flexible functional segregation and integration during language and speech processing
Yuan, B.; Xie, H.; Wang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Chen, L.; Li, C.; Tan, S.; Lin, Z.; Hu, X.; Gu, T.; Lu, J.; Liu, D.-Q.; Wu, J.
Show abstract
Modern linguistic theories and network science propose that the language and speech processing is organized into hierarchical, segregated large-scale subnetworks, with a core of dorsal (phonological) stream and ventral (semantic) stream. The two streams are asymmetrically recruited in receptive and expressive language or speech tasks, which showed flexible functional segregation and integration. We hypothesized that the functional segregation of the two streams was supported by the underlying network segregation. A dynamic conditional correlation approach was employed to construct frame-wise time-varying language networks and investigate the temporal reoccurring patterns. We found that the time-varying language networks in the resting-state robustly clustered into four low-dimensional states, which dynamically reconfigured following a domain-separation manner. Spatially, the hub distributions of the first three states highly resembled the neurobiology of primary auditory processing and lexical-phonological processing, motor and speech production processing, and semantic processing, respectively. The fourth state was characterized by the weakest functional connectivity and subserved as a baseline state. Temporally, the first three states appeared exclusively in limited time bins ([~]15%), and most of the time (> 55%), the language network kept inactive in state 4. Machine learning-based dFC-linguistics prediction analyses showed that dFCs of the four states significantly predicted individual linguistic performance. These findings suggest a domain-separation manner of language network dynamics in the resting-state, which forms a dynamic "meta-networking" (network of networks) framework. HighlightsO_LIThe time-varying language network in the resting-state is robustly clustered into four low-dimensional states. C_LIO_LISpatially, the first three dFC states are cognitively meaningful, which highly resemble the neurobiology of primary auditory processing and lexical-phonological representation, speech production processing, and semantic processing, respectively. C_LIO_LITemporally, the first three states appeared exclusively in limited time bins ([~]15%), and most of the time (> 55%), the language network kept inactive in state 4. C_LIO_LIA dynamic "meta-networking" framework of language network in the resting-state is proposed. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Asymmetric directed functional connectivity within the frontoparietal motor network during motor imagery and execution 97%
- Gene Expression Associated with Individual Variability in Intrinsic Functional Connectivity 97%
- Structural-Functional Brain Network Coupling Predicts Human Cognitive Ability 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The "two-brain" approach reveals the positive role of task-deactivated default mode network in narrative speech comprehension 97%
- Structural brain architectures match intrinsic functional networks and vary across domains: A study from 15000+ individuals 96%
- Development of neonatal connectome dynamics and its prediction for cognitive and language outcomes at age 2 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pattern of frustration formation in the functional brain network 96%
- Regional radiomics similarity networks (R2SNs) in the human brain: reproducibility, small-world properties and a biological basis 96%
- Quantifying the influence of biophysical factors in shaping brain communication through remnant functional networks 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.