Back

Rapid, scalable, combinatorial genome engineering by Marker-less Enrichment and Recombination of Genetically Engineered loci (MERGE)

Abdullah, M.; Greco, B. M.; Laurent, J. M.; Vandeloo, M.; Marcotte, E. M.; Kachroo, A. H.

2022-06-17 synthetic biology
10.1101/2022.06.17.496490 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Large-scale genome engineering in yeast is feasible primarily due to prodigious homology-directed DNA repair (HDR), a plethora of genetic tools, and simple conversion between haploid and diploid forms. However, a major challenge to rationally building multi-gene processes in yeast arises due to the combinatorics of combining all of the individual edits into the same strain. Here, we present an approach for scalable, precise, multi-site genome editing that combines all edits into a single strain without the need for selection markers by using CRISPR-Cas9 and gene drives. First, we show that engineered loci become resistant to the corresponding CRISPR reagent, allowing the enrichment of distinct genotypes. Next, we demonstrate a highly efficient gene drive that selectively eliminates specific loci by integrating CRISPR-Cas9 mediated Double-Strand Break (DSB) generation and homology-directed recombination with yeast sexual assortment. The method enables Marker-less Enrichment and Recombination of Genetically Engineered loci (MERGE) in yeast. We show that MERGE converts single heterologous yeast loci to homozygous loci at [~]100% efficiency, independent of chromosomal location. Furthermore, MERGE is equally efficient at converting and combining loci, thus identifying viable intermediate genotypes. Finally, we establish the feasibility of MERGE by engineering a fungal carotenoid biosynthesis pathway and most of the human proteasome core into yeast. MERGE, therefore, lays the foundation for marker-less, highly efficient, and scalable combinatorial genome editing in yeast.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.