Generative Adversarial Networks Can Create High Quality Artificial Prostate Cancer Magnetic Resonance Images
Xu, I.; Van Booven, D.; Goberdhan, S.; Breto, A. L.; Alhusseini, M.; Algohary, A.; Stoyanova, R.; Mahne, A.; Punnen, S.; ARORA, H.
Show abstract
PurposeRecent integration of open-source data to machine learning models, especially in the medical field, has opened new doors to study disease progression and/or regression. However, the limitation of using medical data for machine learning approaches is the specificity of data to a particular medical condition. In this context, most recent technologies like generative adversarial networks (GAN) could be used to generate high quality synthetic data that preserves the clinical variability. Materials and MethodsIn this study, we used 139 T2-weighted prostate magnetic resonant images (MRI) from various sources as training data for Single Natural Image GAN (SinGAN), to make a generative model. A deep learning semantic segmentation pipeline trained the model to segment the prostate boundary on 2D MRI slices. Synthetic images with a high-level segmentation boundary of the prostate were filtered and used in the quality control assessment by participating scientists with varying degree of experience (more than 10 years, 1 year, or no experience) to work with MRI images. ResultsThe most experienced participating group correctly identified conventional vs synthetic images with 67% accuracy, the group with 1 year of experience correctly identified the images with 58% accuracy, and group with no prior experience reached 50% accuracy. Nearly half (47%) of the synthetic images were mistakenly evaluated as conventional images. Interestingly, a blinded quality assessment by a board-certified radiologist to differentiate conventional and synthetic images was not significantly different in context of the mean quality of synthetic and conventional images. ConclusionsThis study shows promise that high quality synthetic images from MRI can be generated using GAN. Such an AI model may contribute significantly to various clinical applications which involves supervised machine learning approaches.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Rectal Tumor Segmentation with Anomaly Fusion Derived from Anatomical Inpainting: A Multicenter Study 94%
- PathProfiler: Automated Quality Assessment of Retrospective Histopathology Whole-Slide Image Cohorts by Artificial Intelligence, A Case Study for Prostate Cancer Research 93%
- Automated cervix biometry, volumetry and normative models for 3D motion-corrected T2-weighted 0.55-3T fetal MRI during 2nd and 3rd trimesters 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 93%
- Unsupervised Neural Network-Based Image Stitching Method for Bladder Endoscopy 92%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning ensemble for abdominal aortic calcification scoring from lumbar spine X-ray and DXA images 93%
- The mathematics of erythema: Development of machine learning models for artificial intelligence assisted measurement and severity scoring of radiation induced dermatitis 92%
- Fusion of Electronic Health Records and Radiographic Images for a Multimodal Deep Learning Prediction Model of Atypical Femur Fractures 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-scale crowdsourced radiotherapy segmentations across a variety of cancer anatomic sites: Interobserver expert/non-expert and multi-observer composite tumor and normal tissue delineation annotations from a prospective educational challenge 93%
- Weekly Intra-Treatment Diffusion Weighted Imaging Dataset for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing MR-linac Treatment 93%
- Segmentation of vestibular schwannoma from MRI — An open annotated dataset and baseline algorithm 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.