Back

Home-use Photobiomodulation Device Treatment Outcomes for COVID-19

Lim, L.; Hosseinkhah, N.; Buskirk, M. V.; Berk, A.; Loheswaran, G.; Abbaspour, Z.; Smith, A.; Karimpoor, M.; Au, Y. N.; Ho, K. F.; Pushparaj, A.; Zahavi, M.; White, A.; Rubine, J.; Zidel, B.; Henderson, C.; Clayton, R. G.; Tingley, D. R.; Karimpoor, M.; Miller, D. J.; Hamblin, M. R.

2022-06-17 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.06.16.22276503 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDThere is need for non-pharmaceutical treatments for COVID-19. A home-use photobiomodulation (PBM) device was tested as Treatment in a randomized clinical trial. METHODS294 patients were randomized with equal allocation to Treatment or Standard of Care (Control). 199 qualified for efficacy analyses. The Treatment group self-treated for 20 minutes twice daily, for the first 5 days, and subsequently once daily for 30 days. A validated respiratory questionnaire was used, and patients were monitored remotely. The primary endpoint was the time-to-recovery (3 consecutive days of no sickness) for general sickness. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox Proportional Hazards model were primary methods of analyses. RESULTSTreatment patients with collective 0-12 days of symptoms, at moderate-to-severe level on Day 1 of Treatment, did not recover significantly faster than Control. However, for patients with 0-7 days of symptoms there was a significant mean difference of 3 days: Treatment, 18 days (95% CI, 13-20) vs. Control, 21 days (95% CI, 15-28), P=0.050. The Treatment:Control hazard ratio at 1.495 (95% CI, 0.996-2.243), P=0.054 exceeded the pre-trial target of 1.44. Treated patients exceeding 7 days symptoms duration were more tired and had lower energy. None of the patients in the Treatment group suffered death or hospitalization while the Control group had 1 death and 3 severe adverse events requiring hospitalization. CONCLUSIONSPatients with up to 7 days of symptoms at moderate-to-severe levels on first day of Treatment can expect faster recovery for general sickness and several respiratory symptoms. (Funded by Vielight Inc.; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04418505.)

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.