Back

Use of Internally Validated Machine and Deep Learning Models to Predict Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy using data from the BAUS PCNL audit

Geraghty, R.; Finch, W.; Fowler, S.; Sriprasad, S.; Smith, D.; Dickinson, A.; Gall, Z.; Somani, B.

2022-06-16 urology
10.1101/2022.06.16.22276481 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMachine (ML) and Deep learning (DL) are subsets of artificial intelligence that use data to build algorithms. These can be used to predict specific outcomes. To date there have been a few small studies on post-PCNL outcomes. ObjectiveWe aimed to build and internally validate ML/DL models for post-PCNL transfusion and infection using a comprehensive national database. DesignMachine Learning study using prospective national database. Eight machine learning models for 11 outcomes using 43 predictors. Models were complete-case analyses. SettingNational database ParticipantsPatients undergoing PCNL in the UK between 2014-2019. Outcome MeasurementsDiagnostic accuracy statistics including overall accuracy, area-under-the-curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity. Results and Limitations4412 patients were included, with 3088 in the training set and 1324 in the test set. The models predicted need for transfusion and post-operative infection with a very high degree of accuracy (99%) and high AUC (0.99-1.00). Unfortunately, the remainder of the outcomes did not achieve the same high levels. These two outcomes were therefore included in the provisional web-based application: https://endourology.shinyapps.io/PCNL_Prediction_tool/ ConclusionsThis is the largest machine learning study on post-PCNL outcomes to date. These models can predict the need for post-PCNL transfusion and post-PCNL infection at an individual level with excellent accuracy. Further work will be done on model tuning and external validation. Patient SummaryWe used a national database of people having a major kidney stone operation (PCNL). Using this data, we built and tested 8 machine learning models for 11 different outcomes from the operation. Using this method, we can give individual predictions for the likely need for a blood transfusion and development of an infection. We have developed an app to allow surgeons to calculate an individual patients risk prior to surgery.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.