The AI Neuropsychologist: Automatic scoring of memory deficits with deep learning
Langer, N.; Weber, M.; Hebling Vieira, B.; Strzelczyk, D.; Wolf, L.; Pedroni, A.; Heitz, J.; Schultheis, C.; Troendle, M.; Arango Lasprilla, J. C.; Rivera, D.; Scarpina, F.; Zhao, Q.; Leuthold, R.; Wehrle, F.; Jenni, O. G.; Brugger, P.; Zaehle, T.; Lorenz, R.; Zhang, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundMemory deficits are a hallmark of many different neurological and psychiatric conditions. The Rey-Osterrieth complex figure (ROCF) is the state-of-the-art assessment tool for neuropsychologists across the globe to assess the degree of non-verbal visual memory deterioration. To obtain a score, a trained clinician inspects a patients ROCF drawing and quantifies deviations from the original figure. This manual procedure is time-consuming, slow and scores vary depending on the clinicians experience, motivation and tiredness. MethodsHere, we leverage novel deep learning architectures to automatize the rating of memory deficits. For this, we collected more than 20k hand-drawn ROCF drawings from patients with various neurological and psychiatric disorders as well as healthy participants. Unbiased ground truth ROCF scores were obtained from crowdsourced human intelligence. This dataset was used to train and evaluate a multi-head convolutional neural network. ResultsThe model performs highly unbiased as it yielded predictions very close to the ground truth and the error was similarly distributed around zero. The neural network outperforms both online raters and clinicians. The scoring system can reliably identify and accurately score individual figure elements in previously unseen ROCF drawings, which facilitates explainability of the AI-scoring system. To ensure generalizability and clinical utility, the model performance was successfully replicated in a large independent prospective validation study that was pre-registered prior to data collection. ConclusionsOur AI-powered scoring system provides healthcare institutions worldwide with a digital tool to assess objectively, reliably and time-efficiently the performance in the ROCF test from hand-drawn images.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Constrained sampling from deep generative image models reveals mechanisms of human target detection 94%
- Can deep convolutional neural networks support relational reasoning in the same-different task? 93%
- Semantic object-scene inconsistencies affect eye movements, but not in the way predicted by contextualized meaning maps 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.