Trends in telehealth use by Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries and its impact on overall volume of healthcare services
Ellimoottil, C.; Zhu, Z.; Dunn, R. L.; Thompson, M. P.
Show abstract
IntroductionAt the start of the COVID-19 public health emergency, the federal government made temporary Medicare policy changes to expand telehealth coverage, resulting in a surge in telehealth use. As federal and state policymakers currently consider permanent telehealth policy options, it is important to understand the trends in telehealth use during 2021 and whether telehealth has led to an increase in the overall volume of healthcare services. MethodsOur analysis was conducted using Part B claims for 100% of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. We identified all outpatient evaluation and management (E&M) services received by beneficiaries from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021. We then calculated the monthly proportion of outpatient E&M services that were performed in-person and through telehealth. ResultsThe total number of all outpatient E&M services was 289.0 million in 2019, 255.2 million in 2020 (11.7% lower than 2019), and 260.7 million in 2021 (9.8% lower than 2019). Monthly telehealth services peaked at 7.2 million (or 50.7% of monthly E&M services) in April 2020, followed by a slow decline through the end of 2021. During the second half of 2021, telehealth services made up 8.5-9.5% of monthly E&M services. ConclusionFrom April 2020 through December 2021, the monthly volume of telehealth services slowly declined and has plateaued between 8.5-9.5% of all outpatient E&M services received by Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Importantly, the total volume of outpatient E&M services was lower in 2020 and 2021, suggesting that the COVID-19 telehealth flexibilities have not increased the overall volume of outpatient E&M services received by Medicare beneficiaries. These findings should mitigate some concerns about the impact of telehealth on overall healthcare utilization. At the start of the COVID-19 public health emergency, the federal government made temporary Medicare policy changes to expand telehealth coverage, resulting in a surge in telehealth use.1,2 While telehealth was a necessary substitute for in-person care during first few months of the pandemic, there was a decline in the use of telehealth during the second half of 2020.3 As federal and state policymakers currently consider permanent telehealth policy options, it is important to understand the trends in telehealth use during 2021 and whether telehealth has led to an increase in the overall volume of healthcare services.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Wading through Molasses: A qualitative examination of the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of Australian medical practitioners regarding medical billing 93%
- COVID-19 Healthcare Demand Projections: Arizona 92%
- Impact of COVID-19 Second Wave on Healthcare Networks in the United States 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel methodology to measure waiting times for community-based specialist care in a public healthcare system 91%
- The Amortization of Funding Gene Therapies: Making the “Intangibles” Tangible for Patients 90%
- Progressivity of out-of-pocket costs under Australia’s universal health care system: a national linked data study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement Matters: Changing Penalty Calculations under the Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) Cost Hospitals Millions 92%
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 90%
- Integrating Community-Based Health Information System with a Patient-Centered Medical Home to Improve Care of Patients with Hypertension: A Longitudinal Observational Study Protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measure what matters: counts of hospitalized patients are a better metric for health system capacity planning for a reopening 92%
- Using telehealth consultations for healthcare provision to patients from racial/ethnic minorities: A systematic review 91%
- Assessing the quality of clinical and administrative data extracted from hospitals: The General Medicine Inpatient Initiative (GEMINI) experience 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.