Validation of a new coil array tailored for dog functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies
Guran, C.- N. A.; Sladky, R.; Karl, S.; Boch, M.; Laistler, E.; Windischberger, C.; Huber, L.; Lamm, C.
Show abstract
Comparative neuroimaging allows for the identification of similarities and differences between species. It provides an important and promising avenue, to answer questions about the evolutionary origins of the brains organization, in terms of both structure and function. Dog fMRI has recently become one particularly promising and increasingly used approach to study brain function and coevolution. In dog neuroimaging, image acquisition has so far been mostly performed with coils originally developed for use in human MRI. Since such coils have been tailored to human anatomy, their sensitivity and data quality is likely not optimal for dog MRI. Therefore, we developed a multi-channel receive coil (K9 coil) tailored for high-resolution functional imaging in canines, optimized for dog cranial anatomy. In this paper we report structural (n = 9) as well as functional imaging data (resting-state, n = 6; simple visual paradigm, n = 9) collected with the K9 coil in comparison to reference data collected with a human knee coil. Our results show that the K9 coil significantly outperforms the human knee coil, improving the signal-to-noise ratio across the imaging modalities. We noted increases of roughly 45% signal-to-noise in the structural and functional domain. In terms of translation to functional fMRI data collected in a visual flickering checkerboard paradigm, group-level analyses show that the K9 coil performs better than the knee coil as well. These findings demonstrate how hardware improvements may be instrumental in driving data quality, and thus, quality of imaging results, for dog-human comparative neuroimaging. Significance StatementComparative neuroimaging is a powerful avenue to discover evolutionary mechanisms at the brain level. However, data quality is a major constraint in non-human functional magnetic resonance imaging. We describe a novel canine head coil for magnetic resonance imaging, designed specifically for dog cranial anatomy. Data quality performance and improvements over previously used human knee coils are described quantitatively. In brief, the canine coil improved signal quality substantially across both structural and functional imaging domains, with strongest improvements noted on the cortical surface.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tailored haemodynamic response function increases detection power of fMRI in awake dogs (Canis familiaris) 97%
- Multi-centre, multi-vendor reproducibility of 7T QSM and R2* in the human brain: results from the UK7T study 96%
- Comparing the efficacy of data-driven denoising methods for a multi-echo fMRI acquisition at 7T 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-echo Acquisition and Thermal Denoising Advances Precision Functional Imaging 95%
- A resource for development and comparison of multi-modal brain 3T MRI harmonisation approaches 95%
- Visual stimulus-evoked blood velocity responses in individual human posterior cerebral arteries measured with dynamic phase-contrast functional MR angiography 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diffusion MRI Head Motion Correction Methods are Highly Accurate but Impacted by Denoising and Sampling Scheme 95%
- Delineating In-Vivo T1-Weighted Intensity Profiles Within the Human Insula Cortex Using 7-Tesla MRI 94%
- Direct visualization and characterization of the human zona incerta and surrounding structures 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal signal-to-noise changes in combined multiband- and slice-accelerated echo-planar imaging with a 20- and 64-channel coil 95%
- An in-vivo study of BOLD laminar responses as a function of echo time and static magnetic field strength 95%
- Multivoxel Pattern of Blood Oxygen Level Dependent Activity can be sensitive to stimulus specific fine scale responses 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.