Back

Poison frog diet and chemical defense are influenced by availability and selectivity for ants

Moskowitz, N. A.; Alvarez-Buylla, A.; Morrison, C. R.; Chamba, A.; Renteria, J.; Tapia, E. E.; Coloma, L. A.; Donoso, D. A.; O'Connell, L. A.

2022-06-16 ecology
10.1101/2022.06.14.495949 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ability to use small molecule alkaloids as defensive chemicals, often acquired via trophic interactions, has evolved in many organisms. Animals with diet-derived defenses must balance food choices to maintain their defense reservoirs along with other physiological needs. Poison frogs accumulate skin alkaloids from their arthropod diet, but whether they show preference for specific prey remains unexplored. Here, we explore the role of leaf litter prey availability and diet preferences in shaping poison frog chemical defenses along a geographic gradient. We examined skin alkaloid composition, stomach contents and leaf litter ants in aposematic diablito frogs (Oophaga sylvatica) at five sites in northwestern Ecuador, and in sympatric, cryptic Chimbo rocket frogs (Hyloxalus infraguttatus) at one site. We found that differential availability of leaf litter ants influenced alkaloid profiles across diablito populations, and low levels of alkaloids were observed in the sympatric, undefended Chimbo rocket frog. Ants were the primary dietary component of the defended species, while undefended species ate other prey categories including beetles and larvae in addition to ants. A prey selection analysis suggested that defended and undefended frogs both feed on a high proportion of specific small ant genera that naturally contain alkaloids, suggesting that selectivity for toxic prey is not restricted to classically aposematic and highly toxic species. These findings suggest that poison frogs use of feeding resources relative to availability may be an understudied and important selection factor in the evolution of acquired defenses. ResumenLa capacidad de usar alcaloides como productos quimicos defensivos ha evolucionado en muchos organismos, a menudo a traves de interacciones troficas. Los animales con defensas que se derivan de la dieta deben balancear la seleccion de los alimentos para mantener sus reservas defensivas junto con otras necesidades fisiologicas. Las ranas venenosas acumulan alcaloides en la piel procedentes de su dieta de artropodos, pero aun no se ha explorado si muestran preferencia por presas especificas. En este estudio, investigamos el papel de la disponibilidad de presas en la hojarasca y las preferencias dietarias en la configuracion de las defensas quimicas de las ranas venenosas a lo largo de un gradiente geografico. Examinamos la composicion de alcaloides en la piel, el contenido estomacal y la presencia de hormigas de la hojarasca en ranas aposematicas diablito (Oophaga sylvatica) en cinco sitios del noroeste de Ecuador, asi como en la especie criptica y simpatrica rana cohete de Chimbo (Hyloxalus infraguttatus) en un sitio. Encontramos que la disponibilidad diferencial de hormigas en la hojarasca influyo en los perfiles de alcaloides en las poblaciones de diablito, y se detectaron niveles bajos de alcaloides en la rana cohete de Chimbo, previamente considerada indefensa. Las hormigas fueron el componente principal de la dieta en la especie defendida, mientras que la especie indefensa consumio otras categorias de presas, incluidos escarabajos y larvas, ademas de hormigas. Un analisis de seleccion de presas indico que tanto las ranas defendidas como las indefensas prefieren ciertos generos de hormigas pequenas que contienen alcaloides de forma natural, lo que sugiere que la preferencia por presas toxicas no esta restringida a especies clasicamente aposematicas y altamente toxicas. Estos hallazgos sugieren que las preferencias de comportamiento pueden ser un factor de seleccion poco estudiado, pero crucial, en la evolucion de las defensas adquiridas.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.2%
2
Ecological Entomology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.5%
4
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
5
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
8
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.4%
10
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.6%
12
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
21
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.6%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%