Similar striatal activity exerts different control over automatic and flexible motor sequences
Mizes, K. G. C.; Lindsey, J. W.; Escola, S.; Olveczky, B. P.
Show abstract
The ability to sequence movements in response to new task demands enables rich and adaptive behavior. Such flexibility, however, is computationally costly and can result in halting performances. Practicing the same motor sequence repeatedly can render its execution precise, fast, and effortless, i.e., automatic. The basal ganglia are thought to underlie both modes of sequence execution, yet whether and how their contributions differ is unclear. We parse this in rats trained to perform the same motor sequence in response to cues and in an overtrained, or automatic, condition. Neural recordings in the sensorimotor striatum revealed a kinematic code independent of execution mode. While lesions affected the detailed kinematics similarly across modes, they disrupted high-level sequence structure for automatic, but not visually-guided, behaviors. These results suggest that the basal ganglia contribute to learned movement kinematics and are essential for automatic motor skills but can be dispensable for sensory-guided motor sequences.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ventral frontostriatal circuitry mediates the computation of reinforcement from symbolic gains and losses 98%
- Potentiation of active locomotor state by spinal-projecting serotonergic neurons 98%
- A neural circuit framework for economic choice: from building blocks of valuation to compositionality in multitasking 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Layer 6 ensembles can selectively regulate the behavioral impact and layer-specific representation of sensory deviants 98%
- Slowly evolving dopaminergic activity modulates the moment-to-moment probability of movement initiation. 98%
- Local field potentials reflect cortical population dynamics in a region-specific and frequency-dependent manner 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.